- UID
- 687593
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-10-30
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
提纲：
1. 正面观点：统一教材有其有利的一面；
1.1 在大学之前的教育着力于通识教育，国家统一课程规范学生掌握的知识和能力，有助于学生学习，保证学生社会竞争力。（个人）
1.2 国家统一教材可以使各个地区教学内容统一，保证教育的公平性。
2. 反面观点：但这样做也会有不利的一面；
2.1 对学生而言：作为思想自由的一部分，学生有权利选择自己的教育。
2.2 对国家而言：很多国家是多民族国家，不同地区都有各自的文化，每种文化都需要年轻一代去传承。统一课程没有顾忌到文化习俗的差异，势必会影响文化的多样性。
3. 散：综合上面两个方面，我认为我们应该在统一课程的前提下，开设一小部分的选修课程和特色课程。
Is it necessary that all of nation's students study the same national curriculum until they enter college, as the statement contends? Although I agree with the speaker's broad assertion that a nation should set the same national curriculum for all the students before they enter the university, the statement fails to consider the disadvantage of this policy.
Admittedly, the same national curriculum would be beneficial in several respects. Fist of all, the same national curriculum may help students have the broad view of this world and help them do some better choices. For supporting example, comprehensive national curriculum let students select objectively their majors in college. On the contrary, if they don't fully consider all subjects, they tend to select their college major according to just interest or bias just because they can have views of narrow academic fields. In addition, the national curriculum can ensure the equality of the education among the nationwide. Education is usually viewed as a tool for solving social problems, especially social inequality. The same national curriculum can make sure that all students can obtain the same knowledge and have the same chances to attain the university.
But there are some adverse results by taking this policy. The same national curriculum along the nation may kill the students intrinsic of study .As an individual human, the student have the right to learn what he or she really likes. In ideally education, motivation should be intrinsic. Students should want to study the subject for its own sake or for the sense of accomplishment in learning something new. One apt illustration of this point involves Steve Paul Jobs, an American businessman and inventor who is widely recognized as a charismatic pioneer of the personal computer revolution. When Jobs took his calligraphy class, which wasn't part of his major field but he found fascinating, he didn't know ten years later he would design it all into the first Mac, the first computer with beautiful typography. Of course, calligraphy is not a national curriculum. But if Jobs just studied the national curriculum only, this great thing would never happen at all.
At the national level, the national curriculum may harm the diversity of the cultures. Many countries contain a lot of nations. Different nations have their different cultures and every cultures needs the young people to study and inherit. There is no doubt that the national curriculum contains no courses about these cultures just because the national curriculum is aimed at the whole students among the countries. So the policy which is required all of its students to study the same national curriculum is harmful for the diversity of the cultures.
Consider what we have discussed above, I think we should balance the national curriculum and the provincial curriculum. Of course, the national curriculum can transform young students from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. It can help them be more confident about their futures. But we cannot ignore the importance of the provincial curriculum, which cater to the students’ hobbies and can inherit the cultures. In my opinion, we should attach importance to the national curriculum at the same time school should be allowed to set some provincial curriculum.
第一次写ISSUE 拍轻点 |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-12-5 00:34:43
收藏
收藏
楼主
