以下是引用flywood在2004-9-1 0:12:00的发言:39. For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears. Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.
(D) to provide free cashing of government checks, creating basic savings accounts to carry
(E) to provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts that carry
Choice D loses parallelism by dropping the conjunction and', a modification problem results because the participial phrase creating ... attaches to the noun checks, thus distorting the meaning of the last element of the parallel construction. 这两题比较晕,原来我以为现在分词加逗号后肯定就不可能做定语,做定语修饰肯定是紧紧跟在所修饰词的后面,现在看来不是如191,OG的解释明显给出是做定语,还有看OG39,PROTECTING的做作用,我查了以前的贴子到底做定语和状语争论不休,看了半天还是不明白到底做什么. 我的问题是:怎么判断分词结构是做定语呢还是状语,根据逻辑意思吗? 我手头没有语法书,希望大家讨论讨论
这个问题我是这么看的:现在分词在句尾,与主句仅以一个逗号格开,分词是做状语表伴随;但这题没这么简单,主句和分词间隔着一个不定式,也可以说可以把分词理解为就近修饰不定式中的名词的.所以解释说做定语修饰check.
191. Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, [to provide free cashing of government checks, (creating basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.)]这么理解比分词大老远地去就是主句要合理
也就是说,由于被不定式格开,根据就近原则,现在分词只能修饰最近的名词.
这种中间隔着一个成分的修饰问题也是一个考点其他题目中也有体现..
|