ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12646|回复: 27
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-73 求版主帮帮忙

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-18 16:07:00 | 只看该作者

OG12-73 求版主帮帮忙

73. Combning enormous physical strength with higher intelligence, the Neanderthals appear as equipped for facing any obstacle the environment could put in their path, but their relatively sudden disappearance during the Pa;eolithic era indicates that an inabilityto dapt to some environmental change led to their extinction.
a, appear as equipped for facing any obstacle the environment could put in their path
b, appear to have been equipped to face any obstacle the environment could put in their path
c, appear as equipped to face any  obstacle the environment could put in their pahts
d, appeared as equipped to face any obstacle the environment could put in their paths
e, appeared to have been equipped for facing any obstacle the environment could put in their path.
答案B
---
1. appear as equipped, appear-ed as equipped, & appear to have been equipped这三个phrase意思上有什么区别啊?OG里说有的imply现在仍然这么穿, 有的讲以前这么穿,。。。,不是非常清晰。
2. OG答案说之所以用appear是为了与后边indicates平行, 另外也表示这是current evidence about Neanderthals in the past。 我对这个“current evidence”有点疑惑,麻烦您帮我elaborate一下。。要是我用appeared 和 indicated也正确吧?其实我觉得用过去式最好!!
3. 另外我觉得其实即便时态不一样(i.e., appeared & indicate), 也是可以parallel的啊(只要逻辑上同就行啊。。)版主觉得呢?

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/19 0:35:49编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-10-18 17:46:00 | 只看该作者

appear和indicate都是现在时啊,只是一个是neanderthals是复数,一个eolithic era是单数而已啊

至于appear as equipped, appear-ed as equipped, & appear to have been equipped应该是靠理解意思吧……我也不太懂

求教~!~!

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-19 00:10:00 | 只看该作者

UP, 版主请帮帮忙

地板
发表于 2009-10-19 10:23:00 | 只看该作者

如果是appear as,一定是说显现出某一个形态,而现在Neanderthals已经消失了,不能再显现某个形态了,只能是我们从现代的视角去远古的Neanderthals,所以appear用现在时,此时是表达seem的意思(看起来似乎)。不定式用完成时,是表达“过去的事情”。

appear和indicate都是从现在的视角去看,所以应该时态上平行。现在的视角看到的东西就是current evidence。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-19 11:05:00 | 只看该作者

了解了。

版主,我还想问, 像appear to, seem to这样的词组是不是也可以有过去时呢?(比如加上明显的过去时间做状语)google一下有很多啊?什么情况下用过去时呢?

6#
发表于 2009-10-19 11:08:00 | 只看该作者

楼上正解!!!

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-19 11:53:00 | 只看该作者

aeoluseros,

了解了。

我还想问, 像appear to, seem to这样的词组是不是也可以有过去时呢?(比如加上明显的过去时间做状语)google一下有很多啊?什么情况下用过去时呢?

8#
发表于 2009-10-19 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

这应该是纯粹的一般过去时态,从过去的视角来看就是appeared to,比如某个事件在过去看来是怎么怎么样的,通常用appeared to暗含了现在看起来已经不再那样了的含义.

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-19 12:32:00 | 只看该作者
了解了。3Q
10#
发表于 2009-10-19 17:32:00 | 只看该作者

版主我想问一下这个题关于path paths的问题。

OG上对C的解释是while individual N may well have followed different paths, this sentence is about the single evolutionary path taken by N as a species.

不太理解关于他说的taken by N as a species。麻烦帮我解释一下`~谢谢了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 02:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部