OG12-133

jx220 · 发表于 2011-7-21 21:01:58

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
正确答案是 requiring turtle-excluder deveces on shrimp nets is protecting

我的问题是，require turtle-excluder deveces on shrimp nets，有这种用法吗？
我只知道require sb to do & require that sb do
不知道这是何种语言现象。。苦恼

jx220 · 发表于 2011-7-21 21:28:27

大家看了发表一下意见嘛。。。字都是我亲手码上去的

豆菲 · 发表于 2011-7-26 14:41:03

我也觉得是require that sb/sth (should) do 不懂求解答！

stellapass · 发表于 2011-7-26 15:41:34

这种语法现象是虚拟语气的一种---the command subjunctive
它的标准结构是：bossy verb+that+subject+command subjunctive
其中所谓bossy verb ，such as require or propose ，就是告诉人们应该做什么，其实就是咱们高中时候学虚拟语气中那些要求性词。主语后面的command subjunctive的形式就是秃头不定式---to be，省略to
reqire的用法是可以用command subjunctive，也可以用不定式，
eg：We reqire that he be here. 或者为：We require him to be here.

Mrfish · 发表于 2011-7-27 10:35:37

就是require sth咯, 这里简单来说就是require nets, 用requiring来修饰law, 哎其实with law... 乱七八糟一堆也没用, 基本不用看, 简单来看就是their compliance is protecting adult sea turtles.
A很快可以排除的就是protect没加S

反正我是这样想的, 不晓得对不对,

仰天大睡的猫 · 发表于 2011-8-12 10:12:04

这题我是在B和E之间徘徊,如楼上说的很快排除其余3个,但是请问有没有law(s) to do sth这个用法?
是不是原句会是: ...their compliance with laws [(that are) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets] is protecting... 然后缩写成their compliance with laws is protecting...?

Mrfish · 发表于 2011-8-13 09:12:02

这题我是在B和E之间徘徊,如楼上说的很快排除其余3个,但是请问有没有law(s) to do sth这个用法?
是不是原句会是: ...their compliance with laws [(that are) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets] is protecting... 然后缩写成their compliance with laws is protecting...?

-- by 会员仰天大睡的猫 (2011/8/12 10:12:04)

法律法规规定一类名词后面均用DOING修饰, 例如本题的LAW后面必须加requiring，可以很快排除E

仰天大睡的猫 · 发表于 2011-8-14 08:55:07

谢谢鱼先生!

莫醒醒 · 发表于 2011-10-17 10:08:22

亲，我喜欢你那签名。~祝我19号杀G成功吧！我其实很弱，就看了一个月时间，阅读还是做不完，指着机经了。

OG12-133

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()