Theessential condition for the decay of the vacuum is the presence of an intenseelectric field. As a result of thedecay of the vacuum, the space permeated bysuch a field can be said to acquire an electric charge, and it can be called acharged vacuum. The particles that materialize in the space make the chargemanifest. An electric field of sufficient intensity to create a charged vacuumis likely to be found in only one place: in the immediate vicinity of a superheavyatomic nucleus, one with about twice as many protons as the heaviest naturalnuclei known. A nucleus that large cannot be stable, but it might be possibleto assemble one next to a vacuum for long enough to observe the decay of thevacuum. The author ‘ s assertions concerning the conditions that lead to thedecay of the vacuum would bemost weakened if which of the following occurred? (A)Scientists created an electric field next to a vacuum, but found that theelectric field was not intense enough to create a charged vacuum. (B)Scientists assembled a superheavy atomic nucleus nextto a vacuum, but found that no virtualparticles were created in the vacuum‘ s region ofspace. (C)Scientists assembled a superheavy atomic nucleus nextto a vacuum, but found that they couldnot then detect any real particles in thevacuum‘ s region of space. (D)Scientistsintroduced a virtual electron and a virtualpositron into a vacuum‘ s region of space, butfound that the vacuum did not thenfluctuate. (E)Scientists introduced a real electron and a real positroninto a vacuum‘ s region of space, but found thatthe total energy of the space increased bythe energy equivalent of the mass of theparticles. .Anyway, for35-7 I think the answer is C. The passage says that in the presence of a strongenough electric field, the vacuum (empty space) will spontaneously becomecharged. The charge comes from particles that materialize in space. The authorsays that this will happen outside a superheavy nucleus. Thus, if experimenterslooked around a superheavy nucleus but couldn't find any (real) chargedparticles materializing, this would contradict the author's claim. I don'tthink A is correct, because perhaps the experimenters just did not make astrong enough electric field. I don't think B is correct, because the passagetalks about the materialization of particles, making them seem real notvirtual. But it sort of bothers me that they use this language in the answers,because a non-physicist most likely does not know the difference between realand virtual particles. So if you get a question like this on the real exam, Iguess that's just bad luck. Anyway, D and E talk about things that seemunrelated to the passage. Recentscholarship has strongly suggested that the aspects of early NewEngland culture that seem to have been most distinctly Puritan, such as thestrong religious orientation and the communal impulse, were not typical of NewEngland as a whole, but were largely confined to the two colonies of Massachusettsand Connecticut. Thus, what in contrast to the Puritan colonies appears toProfessor Davis to be peculiarly Southern was not only more typically Englishthan the cultural patterns exhibited by Puritan Massachusetts and Connecticut,but also almost certainly characteristic of most other early modern Britishcolonies from Barbados north to Rhode Island and New Hampshire. Within thelarger framework of American colonial life, then, not the Southern but thePuritan colonies appear to have been distinctive, and even they seem to havebeen rapidly assimilating to the dominant cultural patterns by the lateColonial period. ( 145 words) 8. Which ofthe following statements could most logically follow thelast sentence of the passage? (A) Thus,had more attention been paid to the evidence,Davis would not have been tempted to arguethat the culture of the South divergedgreatly from Puritan culture in the seventeenthcentury. (B) Thus,convergence, not divergence, seems to havecharacterized the cultural development of theAmerican colonies in the eighteenth century. (C) Thus,without the cultural diversity represented by theAmerica South, the culture of colonial Americawould certainly have been homogeneousin nature. (D) Thus,the contribution of Southern colonials to Americanculture was certainly overshadowed by that ofthe Puritans. (E) Thus,the culture of America during the Colonial period wasfar more sensitive to outside influencesthan historians are accustomed to (131 words) As for 17-7,I am actually not sure about the answer. I don't think A is correct, becausethe article admits that the Southern culture is distinct from Puritan culture;it just claims that most other American colonies were also unlike Puritanculture and more like the South. I think B might be correct because it is inline with the last two lines of the passage, and it also agrees with theoverall claim of the passage that most of the American colonies had similarcultures. I don't think C is correct, because according to the passage, it isnot the South that is different from the rest of the colonies, it was onlyMassachusetts and Connecticut that were unlike all the others. To me, D and Edo not seem supported by the passage.
|