- UID
- 583738
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-18
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
Currently, as we all know, governments--stands as the leaders of the populaces--should recognize the path they are going to step on as well as the direction they are determined to heading. Hence, the governments bear a responsibility to balance their energy of solving both kinds of problems, whether they are impending or potential.
Admittedly, solving the immediate problems is surely the convenient way to win the support of the populace for any existing government. Since the populace lacks the sight of panorama to some extent, they could be satisfied to find that the government is doing something patent to improve their life and secure their safety. Pursuing this line of reasoning, the whole administrate group might be benefited by the up hold of the populace. For example, the populace in the U.S. is complaining about losing jobs. It may remain a tough problem for the government to tackle, but once this problem is found a way to breach, the supports from populace could resurrect, and the equanimity of the society might be preserved once more. In this case, what populaces are willing to see solved is the willingness and actions by the government. This assumption proves to be one fraction of the responsibility of the government. Hence, if the government takes step to come to grips with the economic recession, it will certainly be advantageous for the whole nation to head forward.
However, as mentioned above, the populace might be unable to perceive the potential hazard of focusing only on the immediate problems of today. What must be kept in mind is that we are confronted with more unseen or unpredictable dangers than tangible ones nowadays. But the populaces feel unnecessary to behold the somewhat horrible situation. After all, one of the most crucial functions of the government is to keep its nation safe and steady so as to pave the way for a more comfortable life of its populace. For instance, that the U.S. is dedicated to improving military equipment is no secret. But what seems to be weird is that there are not so many wars to use this equipment--except the ones at the Middle East which is against most people's wills. Why should the government keep supporting such a big budget? The answer might lie in the truth that safety of its populace is paramount and the government cannot take risks to overlook it. Had the U.S. not kept improved its equipment, it could not maintain so much menace to other nations as today. Thus, overlooking the problems of the future is not advantageous at all.
On the whole, it's reasonable to concentrate the government's energy on solving the immediate problems of today, but the anticipated problems of the future are simply not right to be neglected. It proves to be the government's responsibility to find a balance between these two kinds of problems albeit it may appear to be an albatross around the government's neck. After all, only by paying attention to both problems could a nation thrive.
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-10-20 23:01:44
收藏
收藏
楼主
