如题，例子是the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.(这是划线句子) 给的答案是: the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms has not risen comparably OG认为错误两处：第一have 改成has，这没问题。第二处句尾处OG认为答案更concisely 为什么who are women不紧跟judges and partners呢？
不一定， 关键在于意思，与是否歧义，逻辑与句子意思是王道 这个是gmat考试中的正确句子 After more than four decades of research and development, a new type of jet engine is being tested that could eventually propel aircraft anywhere in the world
下面是一些个人理解 楼主说的这句话中 judges and patners后面跟了两个修饰语 at major law firms 和 who are women 按照Manhattan4th 的说法，这两个都算noun modifier noun modifier的原则是touch rule —即modifier要和noun 紧邻 既然这两个都是noun modifier 那么作者应该按照要表达的意思安排这两个modifier的意思，如果把 who 引导的从句放在介宾短语前就会改变句意了~~~
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-2-18 07:42:05
收藏
收藏
楼主
