Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who
这道题印的答案是E，个人被那个what的成分给搞混了，求大牛们分析一下！
另外还有很多疑问，求讨论！
-- by 会员 hexin0909 (2012/9/9 21:20:54)
it is not evidence of human ； it is evidence related to human （so you should use the that-clause）A.E OUT
stunning evidence cannot be logically parallel with hunting ground B.C OUT
what-clause here acts as a noun (from what -clause = from sth) | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-9-9 21:20:54
收藏
收藏
楼主
跪求各位大牛帮忙啊- -
