ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12335|回复: 24
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]OG11th-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-1-17 08:44:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]OG11th-11

11.             Warning that computers in the United States are not secure, the National Academy of Sciences has urged the nation to revamp computer security procedures, institute new emergency response teams, creating a special nongovernment organization to take charge of computer security planning.


(A)         creating a special nongovernment organization to take


(B)         creating a sepecial nongovernment organization that takes


(C)         creating a special nongovernment organization


(D)        for taking and create a special nongovernment organization for taking


(E)         and create a special nongovernment organization to take



选E?

沙发
发表于 2006-1-17 08:57:00 | 只看该作者
E,主要以平行判断,并且表目的只能用不定式。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-1-17 12:52:00 | 只看该作者
got it, thanks!
地板
发表于 2006-3-16 00:00:00 | 只看该作者

?OG11th是什么时候出的亚?


5#
发表于 2006-5-26 04:32:00 | 只看该作者

2005年就出了

11. Warning that computers in the United States are not secure, the National Academy of Sciences has urged the nation to revamp computer security procedures, institute new emergency response teams, creating a special nongovernment organization to take charge of computer security planning.

(A) creating a special nongovernment organization to take

(B) creating a sepecial nongovernment organization that takes

(C) creating a special nongovernment organization

(D) for taking and create a special nongovernment organization for taking

(E) and create a special nongovernment organization to take

B中的“that takes"  答案中说是illogical的

我觉得实际上还是可以理解的啊,就是一个定语从句修饰nongovernment  organization

why???????

6#
发表于 2006-6-4 20:22:00 | 只看该作者

还有一个问题,

using the participle creating not only violates parelleism but also cause misreading the participial phrase could modify the first part of the sentence(这里是指什么)

7#
发表于 2006-6-5 10:12:00 | 只看该作者
the National Academy of Sciences has urged the nation to revamp computer security procedures, institute new emergency response teams,
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-5 10:12:41编辑过]
8#
发表于 2006-6-5 19:38:00 | 只看该作者
tongyi
9#
发表于 2006-6-5 20:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用当当84在2006-6-4 20:22:00的发言:

还有一个问题,

using the participle creating not only violates parelleism but also cause misreading the participial phrase could modify the first part of the sentence(这里是指什么)

这里如果用现在分词的话,就会出现修饰不明的问题。正如og里面的官方解释所讲的:会导致误读:creating这个动作成了national academy...发出的了。但是在这道题里面的三个平行动作的逻辑主语是the nation。我是这样理解的。

10#
发表于 2006-7-4 05:53:00 | 只看该作者

5 楼问题同问:

B中的“that takes"  答案中说是illogical的

我觉得实际上还是可以理解的啊,就是一个定语从句修饰nongovernment  organization

why???????

restrictive clause "that takes ..." modifies organization. present tense can be used to mean 一种特征. 这里说明organization的性质. 为何不可?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 12:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部