- UID
- 907972
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-7-10
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
7#
楼主 |
发表于 2014-8-18 05:11:34
|
只看该作者
ayoyoyo 发表于 2014-8-17 23:04
这句话后面是个同位语,要补的话是这样的
..., a greater proportion than the proportion in any previo ...
哦哦哦 是我疏忽了 没有看到比的是a greater proportion。但是如果没有这个同位语,比的是cost的话就是it did而不是that对吧?我的意思是句子变成了Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992---more than it did in 2014.
因为我看到了这样一道题: only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-fewer than have been killed by bee stings.
我现在依然不是很能灵活运用在比较中用that还是补出主谓。是可以通过意思,但是我觉得有时候我要是通过意思就很容易错,比如上面那句话我会以为单纯比较人数,而错选了 only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-fewer than those killed by bee stings. 我后来就理解为这句话不是单纯比较人数,而是在比较人的属性,需要补出主谓。不知道你在比较的补出问题上有什么诀窍吗?谢谢!
|
|