- UID
- 612942
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-3-7
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
224. (GWD-12-Q13)
Although energy prices have tripled in the United States over the last two years, research indicates few people to have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do, nor are they making fuel efficiency a priority when shopping for cars.
A. few people to have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do, nor are they making
B. few people having significantly reduced the amount of driving they do or made
C. that there are few people who have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do, nor having made
D. that few people have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do and are not making
E. that few people have significantly reduced the amount of driving they do or made
其实这个题目做对了，就是一看笔记纠结了，已经是否定含义了不需要再有nor，只要用or就好；这个怎么会这样说？因为lili语法笔记说了，or是必须用在否定句，否定含义不等于否定句，我非常确定这一点，所以我从逻辑上能判断出用or，但是这个否定含义，我认为和赵丽语法冲突了。。。表示不理解，求证
还有一个题目
The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor's unqualifying support.
A.
have consistently received labor's unqualifying support
B.
are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor
C.
have consistently received the unqualified support of labor
D.
receive consistent and unqualified support by labor
(C)
E.
are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor
1. by someone修饰的动词，所以不能receive support by labor，所以DE排除
笔记上说因为这个知识点排除了DE，我不理解了，这个为什么，而且，这种我能推广到只要是介词（for,with......)都这样用是否修饰动词来判断吗？
还是别的？
因为貌似说过，with这类不就不能看是否修饰动词来判断吗？ |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-6-10 21:28:39
收藏
收藏
楼主
