ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2521|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP2-147里面的不定式做定语感觉好奇怪

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-16 13:29:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
147. (32567-!-item-!-188;#058&007187)

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from
an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.          

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally
evolved
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally
evolving
(D) to suggest that the elephant has descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally
evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally
evolved

E,没有意见,只是感觉to suggest挺奇怪的,感觉用suggesting会好点。大家有同感么
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-17 14:49:18 | 只看该作者
关于不定式做定语,有NN给指点一下么
板凳
发表于 2009-12-18 00:27:02 | 只看该作者
嗯,这道题我觉得用suggesting就是修饰evidence怎么样。用to do貌似就是和found承接,表目的。不知道对不对……
地板
发表于 2011-6-3 18:01:32 | 只看该作者
顶起来继续问~不是说to do做定语有逻辑主语上的歧义吗?这道题中为什么不会造成to suggest 修饰主句主语embryologists的歧义吖?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 12:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部