ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2223|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全973 代词的用法

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-14 22:58:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
大全973,treat的用法
1.        No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items, travelers often treat customs inspectors like wanton poachers rather than government employees.

(A) travelers often treat customs inspectors like wanton poachers rather than government employees

(B) travelers often treat customs inspectors as wanton poachers instead of government employees

(C) travelers often treat customs inspectors as if they were not government employees but wanton poachers

(D) customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employeesD

(E) customs inspectors are often treated not like government employees but wanton poachers by travelers
当初选了E,觉得they指代有问题,D选项中的they怎么解释呢? E选项是不是错在but那个地方,因为和not like不平行,如果要E正确的话是不是应该弄成 but like。。。。?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-15 06:58:56 | 只看该作者
我觉得这里的they指代就是逻辑主语customs inspectors,我记得以前看过一个帖子,大部分句子里代词指代的都是逻辑主语,而非我们经常以为的就近指代(不肯定,只是我看过的)

我觉得E的话,应该改成
customs inspectors are often treated by travelers not like government employees but like wanton poachers
这样可能好一点

欢迎讨论和指正~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-15 08:24:10 | 只看该作者
我觉得这里的they指代就是逻辑主语customs inspectors,我记得以前看过一个帖子,大部分句子里代词指代的都是逻辑主语,而非我们经常以为的就近指代(不肯定,只是我看过的)

我觉得E的话,应该改成
customs inspectors are often treated by travelers not like government employees but like wanton poachers
这样可能好一点

欢迎讨论和指正~
-- by 会员 camelo777 (2011/6/15 6:58:56)



by travelers 一定要靠近谓语吗?我对状语要不要靠近谓语一直很疑惑。GMAT语法老有状语不靠近谓语的情况,好像是宾语优先靠近谓语吧?可是如果宾语靠近谓语的话,状语会不会有修饰宾语的情况呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 18:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部