ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Unlike most other mergers in the utility industry, which have been driven by the need to save money and extend companies' service areas, the merger of the nation's leading gas and electric company is intended to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question with states opening their utility markets to competition.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2677|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

对于Ron在manhattan上对于GWD-9-Q17的解释有自己的疑问,求讨论

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-14 21:49:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
题目贴出Unlike most other mergers in the utility industry, which have been driven by the need to save money and extend companies’ service areas, the merger of the nation’s leading gas and electric company is intended to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question with states opening their utility markets to competition.


(A) and electric company is intended to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question with states opening

(B) and electric companies are intended to create a huge network for marketing the utilities in question as states open

(C) and electric companies are intended to create a huge network that will be marketing the utilities in question, with states opening

(D) company and electric company are intending to create a huge marketing network for the utilities in question, with states opening

(E) company and leading electric company is intended to create a huge network for marketing the utilities in question as states open

前面的解释都很认同,已经能够得到答案E了(谓语为is排除bcd,merger必须是两个公司才能合并排除a),不过对于A为什么错误的第二点解释有疑问。
* "with states opening..." is incorrect. when you have an -ING WITHOUT COMMA modifier, like this one, it's a RESTRICTIVE ("essential") modifier. this means that we're only talking about those states that are "opening their utility markets to competition", the implication being that only some states are doing so. the intended meaning is better conveyed by "as states open..."
这里的with states opening 难道不可以是with+n+宾补的伴随状语么,这样opening就不是states的restictive modifier了啊。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-14 21:51:26 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-14 22:07:59 | 只看该作者
up
求解答啊求解答!
各位牛逼闪闪的CDer们快快粗线。。。
地板
发表于 2012-8-14 22:36:23 | 只看该作者
in question with

这里的with不是做伴随状语吧
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-14 23:57:26 | 只看该作者
in question with

这里的with不是做伴随状语吧
-- by 会员 djdj520r (2012/8/14 22:36:23)


请问in question with是一个短语么,什么意思呀
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 17:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部