ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3487|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 sc 113 如何分辨主语?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-6-16 12:09:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
113. Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the ? sheries and oil ? elds of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
(A)  Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the ? sheries and oil ? elds of large sea areas, they have already stimulated
(B)  Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the ? sheries and oil ? elds of arge sea areas, it has already stimulated
(C)  Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the ? sheries and oil ? elds of large sea areas under provisions of the new aritime code, already stimulating
(D)  Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the ? sheries and oil ? elds of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated
(E)  Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the ? sheries and oil ? elds of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

答案为B
我有个问题:
OG说要分清provisions和code哪个是stimulated的主语,这要用什么方法来判断呢?感觉provisions也通的啊
谢谢广大CDer!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-6-16 13:54:49 | 只看该作者
答楼主:
OG 对这道题原句的解释是:
In this sentence, the there are … that …
construction contributes nothing more than
unnecessary words. The sentence needs to make
clear whether provisions or code is the subject of
the main verb stimulated.

OG解释的意思是要分清主语是哪个,而不是说让code成为主语。provision也可以是主语,只是选项里没有以provision为主语的正确句子
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-6-16 21:17:55 | 只看该作者

谢谢回复~

这么说也对哦,但不知道还有没有其他的看法,期待下
地板
发表于 2010-6-27 14:22:54 | 只看该作者
A部分的provision和后面的provide是不是redundant?
5#
发表于 2010-7-20 17:44:59 | 只看该作者
provide和provision必然重复了嘛~一个词的两个形式

OG的意思就是code和provision都可能做主语,只是句子里一定要说清楚哪个是主语。不要指代不清。
6#
发表于 2011-3-24 01:00:47 | 只看该作者
provisions 这里是条款的意思,海洋法的条款,个人认为provisions是主语而code不是。只是答案中句子表达冗余了。 there are  . .... that 完全可以被去掉
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 01:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部