ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 27240|回复: 45
打印 上一主题 下一主题

比较2道GWD 5-14, 7-32,xdjm's来帮忙呀~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-14 09:35:00 | 只看该作者

比较2道GWD 5-14, 7-32,xdjm's来帮忙呀~

Gwd 5-14


Q14:


Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.



  1. as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as

  2. as had been in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what

  3. than there was in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as that which

  4. than in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as

  5. than in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what

what 不是多余吗?


今天作了GWD7,发现自己的想法有问题。里面的32题as as 后面就没有what,和本题不一样,what 是可省可不么?请大家解惑!





A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.






  1. claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

  2. claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought

  3. claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts

  4. claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts

  5. claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts  答案:A

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-14 9:40:08编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-14 09:38:00 | 只看该作者

我的问题是:

都是as as 为什么一个有what ,一个没有。应该有一个标准吧,不能有没有都算对。

后一题的答案好像很难推翻,所以怀疑5-14得答案。any other得问题。

请大家看看!

板凳
发表于 2004-8-14 10:40:00 | 只看该作者

Even though more money was removed out of stock funds in July as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as an industry trade group had previously estimated.

  1. as in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as

  2. as had been in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what

  3. than there was in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as that which

  4. than in any month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as

  5. than(it was) in any other month since October 1987, sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what( the sales...that)

这题一比较也只能选E了。答案是E吧。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-14 10:51:00 | 只看该作者

是的,leeon,是E.但是由于我上面讲的问题,我在怀疑D的any是不是一定错。如果“since1987年7月以来的这些个月”本身就是指7月之前的月份,那就可以用any而不用any other。不过又说不通,因为平常说since~,也是包含现在的。所以矛盾ing.discuss~

5#
发表于 2004-8-14 10:56:00 | 只看该作者
这里money was removed out of stock funds in July 是一般过去时,并没有过去的过去的概念。所以后面的逻辑上只能说any other month。
6#
发表于 2004-8-16 12:41:00 | 只看该作者
偶觉得what补出不能说是多余,只能说没有what是省略。
7#
发表于 2004-8-25 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
同意LES, 请参考刘振民GMAT语法改错精解9-12(159页)选项E的题解.
8#
发表于 2004-9-11 04:17:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得是D,既然What是可以省可以不省,那么按照ETS的偏好,省比不省好。

关于Other我觉得是多余的,因为since October 1987已经排除了7月,所以不存在比较范围包含自身的矛盾,如果加了other反而罗索,而且逻辑不通:在7月转移的金额比其他10月以后转移的多,是不是很怪?

如果since6月,包含7月,那么就应该排除7月,加other.本来就不包含,加other反而是错的.




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-11 4:33:41编辑过]
9#
发表于 2004-9-11 07:09:00 | 只看该作者

順便在此問一下GWD7  Q#32

A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.

  1. claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought (A)

我想請教的是 (A)的動詞是否有省略have? "previously have thought "?

10#
发表于 2004-9-11 08:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用micht在2004-9-11 7:09:00的发言:

順便在此問一下GWD7  Q#32


A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.







  1. claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought (A)

我想請教的是 (A)的動詞是否有省略have? "previously have thought "?


have不存在省略的问题,这里的previously就标志着用一般过去式最好,(这些分析家先前设想的经济如何如何,但是实际发生的和他们过去预计的不太一样)。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-21 07:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部