关于“比较”的问题请大牛们解释一下谢谢

翁羽凌虚 · 发表于 2011-2-9 17:34:11

我一直搞不明白比较的句子里面是谁个谁在比较，应该怎么省略的问题。
比如：Although Napoleon's army entered Russia
with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
(A)they had in their previous campaigns

(B)their previous campaigns had had

(C)they had for any previous campaign

(D)in their previous campaigns

(E)for any previous campaign
这个题里面是介宾比较吗？比较对象是不是supplies the army had when it entered Russia 和 the supplies the army had had for any precious campaign? 还原以后是不是 Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than those they had had for any precious campaign? 如果是的话这里省略了 those they had had所依据的原则是什么？还是说比较从句中相同的主语，宾语还有相同的主谓结构都可以省略？
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than in any previous election.
这个句子补全了是不是可以是：Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, and it was a greater proportion than that had been in any previous election? 如果可以那这里省略that had been是依据什么呢？
还有一般在 .....more....than....的结构里面，是不是more前面的对象和than后面的对象在比较啊？
嗯比较问题我越来越然了，拜托帮我解释一下，大恩不言谢~~~

aeoluseros · 发表于 2011-2-9 18:42:47

actually，是名词比较，所以不要主谓。名词比较可以直接把相同的比较部分省略。
而如果主谓比较，就不能仅留一个介宾短语。除非是介宾短语的比较。

aeoluseros · 发表于 2011-2-9 18:43:38

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than those for any precious campaign...
those指代supplies.

翁羽凌虚 · 发表于 2011-2-9 18:49:56

谢谢啊
嗯那这个名词包括什么，宾语和主语吗？

aeoluseros · 发表于 2011-2-9 18:57:09

就是单纯的名词比较，比如凌虚的两个例子，一个比较的是supplies，是宾语，一个比较的是proportion，是同位语
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than (that) in any previous election?
补全应该就是这样了，that指代proportion，因为是名词比较，可以省去that.

翁羽凌虚 · 发表于 2011-2-9 19:04:16

啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~懂了嘿嘿谢谢牛~~~

关于“比较”的问题请大牛们解释一下谢谢

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

关于“比较”的问题 请大牛们解释一下 谢谢

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

关于“比较”的问题请大牛们解释一下谢谢