- UID
- 358420
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-15
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
68. The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
(A) that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but (B) that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also (C) having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but (D) cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also (E) cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
Rhetorical construction; Agreement; Grammatical construction Th is sentence, explaining interconnections among a number of events, needs to be streamlined as much as possible in order to become understandable. To this end, unnecessary words and structures should be eliminated. Prominent among these are the relative clauses beginning with that. Additionally, the subject of this sentence is the plural trenches, which requires a plural verb. A Th at were cut … and that were arising … are unnecessarily wordy and create an unnecessarily complicated and confusing sentence structure. B In addition to the unnecessarily wordy relative clauses, the singular verb yields does not agree with the plural subject trenches. C Having been cut … is unnecessarily wordy; arising simultaneously must be followed by the preposition with in order to make sense. D The singular verb yields does not agree with the plural subject trenches; also adds no meaning to the sentence
E Correct. Unnecessary clauses and phrases are avoided, and the subject and verb of the main clause agree in number. Th e correct answer is E.
疑问如下: 根据选项E,正确句子为 The first trenches cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
首先得 说 我根本看不懂为什么要选E,因为E在我看来是错误的,而且我看不懂E选项下的句子结构。 1. GMAT是不是特别讨厌 that... that...这种形式?基本上我感觉出题者不能容忍有2个that引导的丛句同时出现。孙悟空师傅们,你们觉得呢?每次解释中都说that that 很wordy, confusing, complicated.但是我觉得并没有confusing阿,反而修饰成分变得很清晰,被修饰的主语很清晰。你们认为呢。 2。 在E选项中,句首变成了:The first treches cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, 请问这里没有了that were,如何表现出treches 是被 cut 是被动语态呢?
其次,cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria,明显是修饰The first treches的。只有当定语从句中that, which所指代的是宾语,连词本身才能被省略。但是在这里 trenches 是主语,that were 怎么能被省略阿嗄啊啊啊啊?
3。再者,在E选项中,如果没有that 引导的从句, trenches 与Syria不就变成了同位语的关系了么,这也太难以理解了八, 4。 在E选项中,have yielded strong evidence that也让我迷惑。为什么不让用evidence for 啊????我所熟悉的句子一直是evidence for something,for 后面句子应该是evidence所要解释的结论。 这里用evidence that, 也就变成了that 后面的句子就是evidence本身。但是细读句子,傻子都看得出来that 后面的句子是evidence所要解释的结论。 |
|