ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2369|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

12版红OG662页26题求教

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-1-24 22:57:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
12版红OG662页26题:
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
答案是E选项,我的理解是这应该是一个并列句,就是letters were written..., outnumbered....这里,outnumber应该用和were written一样的过去时才对吧?反观A选项,用一个分词结构做定语来避免了时态的问题,不是更好吗?

而且,E选项的非限定性定从中,这个which到底是指代Susan Huntington Dickinson还是Emily Dickinson's letters?不是有指代不清的问题吗?

请赐教,谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-1-25 00:15:50 | 只看该作者
A选项读起来相当别扭,和它所要修饰的letters相隔太远,这不是习惯的表达方式,如果非要用这种结构,我觉得outnumbering her letters to anyone else可以作为插入语放在Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson和were之间,不过这样句子的重心就发生变化了,也不符合要求,所以还是E最好,而且which是不用于修饰人的,这里这能修饰letters,没有歧义
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-25 01:22:49 | 只看该作者
谢谢zhepeking这么晚还回帖!

关于修饰距离较远我明白,但是E的时态不是还有问题吗?Outnumber不是应该用过去式吗?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-26 22:41:16 | 只看该作者
顶一顶,盼高人。
5#
发表于 2011-1-26 22:50:20 | 只看该作者
再多读读原文,你会发现outnumber是整句话的谓语动词,而“which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886”是用来修饰letters的,
比较一下A和E,E的表达更简洁咯
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-26 23:24:46 | 只看该作者
谢谢evelyn205205

终于明白了,把定从去掉就好看很多:
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.

这个可以理解为客观事实所以用一般现在时吧?
7#
发表于 2011-1-27 08:31:56 | 只看该作者
这个可以理解为客观事实所以用一般现在时吧?
-- by 会员 EdwardMa (2011/1/26 23:24:46)

[/quote]

没错
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 20:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部