ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6320|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全578, 即补充199

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-10 21:14:00 | 只看该作者

大全578, 即补充199

578.      Personal trainers and fitness coaches are to the narcissistic 1980’s just like a private fencing master and dancing teacher was to an earlier time.fficeffice" />


(A) just like a private fencing master and dancing teacher was


(B) as have been a private fencing master and dancing teacher


(C) what private fencing masters and dancing teachers were


(D) what private fencing masters and dancing teachers areC


(E) just the same as private fencing masters and dancing teachers had been


答案是C, 有种说法, A be to B what C be to D, 那位能讲讲它的出处?


另外, 如果这里E的系动词是were对否? just as....were呐? 谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-3-11 02:35:00 | 只看该作者
出自刘振民


    

板凳
发表于 2004-3-11 09:23:00 | 只看该作者
.      (Personal trainers and fitness coaches-subject) are ( missing object) (to the narcissistic 1980’s -prep clause) {just like a private fencing master and dancing teacher was to an earlier time-should be object, therefore a noun clause should be used)


The clarification by LZM does not note the sentence structure of above problem. Please pay attention to the bold face. If you notice the object in the first part of the sentence is missing, you can conclude that the object must be posed at the end.

地板
发表于 2004-7-23 21:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用weiyu在2004-3-11 9:23:00的发言:.   (Personal trainers and fitness coaches-subject) are ( missing object) (to the narcissistic 1980’s -prep clause) {just like a private fencing master and dancing teacher was to an earlier time-should be object, therefore a noun clause should be used)
The clarification by LZM does not note the sentence structure of above problem. Please pay attention to the bold face. If you notice the object in the first part of the sentence is missing, you can conclude that the object must be posed at the end.


what a excellent explanation, just what I need.


I think by clarifing the structure, I'll never fail to solve this type of problems whenever encountering them.


Thanks a million.


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-23 21:27:43编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-7-8 15:57:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用weiyu在2004-3-11 9:23:00的发言:
.   (Personal trainers and fitness coaches-subject) are ( missing object) (to the narcissistic 1980’s -prep clause) {just like a private fencing master and dancing teacher was to an earlier time-should be object, therefore a noun clause should be used)
The clarification by LZM does not note the sentence structure of above problem. Please pay attention to the bold face. If you notice the object in the first part of the sentence is missing, you can conclude that the object must be posed at the end.

我怎么感觉还是糊涂呢,

a be to b what c be to d
这是一种固定搭配,意思是a对b来说,正如c对d一样

那么按照weiyuGG说的,好像不是这样的


另外,看到一个网友这样解释


以下是引用babydevil在2005-5-19 11:56:00的发言:

我也做错了,选了D ,后来仔细想了想,可能是这样:1980’s是指的一帮80年代出生的人,同时an earlier time并不是指80年代以前出生的人,而是指现在以前的过去某个时间。整句应该这样理解:


Personal trainers and fitness coaches are to the narcissistic 1980's what private fencing masters and dancing teachers were to (the narcissistic 1980's) an earlier time.


我觉得这个比较否和对b来说,正如c对d一样这个意思,但是好像在和weiyuGG的解释比iqlai又有些糊涂了,大家怎么理解呢
6#
发表于 2005-8-13 14:08:00 | 只看该作者
3x to weiyu
7#
发表于 2005-9-28 03:39:00 | 只看该作者

感觉句子结构是这样才对啊。A is to B what C was to D为习惯表达的说法牵强了点,只能当成是死记硬背的招法了

8#
发表于 2005-10-8 14:10:00 | 只看该作者

weiyud的意思是这样吧


A be to B what C be to D.


理解时 是 A be( what C be to D) to B. 而what C be to D 有些长所以让to B.提前使句子紧凑就变成了A be to B what C be to D.

9#
发表于 2007-8-6 10:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用weiyu在2004-3-11 9:23:00的发言:
.   (Personal trainers and fitness coaches-subject) are ( missing object) (to the narcissistic 1980’s -prep clause) {just like a private fencing master and dancing teacher was to an earlier time-should be object, therefore a noun clause should be used)
        
The clarification by LZM does not note the sentence structure of above problem. Please pay attention to the bold face. If you notice the object in the first part of the sentence is missing, you can conclude that the object must be posed at the end.

不懂说的什么意思???

anybody can help!

10#
发表于 2009-1-27 21:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用zxl_moon在2005-10-8 14:10:00的发言:

weiyud的意思是这样吧

A be to B what C be to D.

理解时 是 A be( what C be to D) to B. 而what C be to D 有些长所以让to B.提前使句子紧凑就变成了A be to B what C be to D.

agree

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 01:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部