ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1788|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

还有两天上战场,请教一条AA机经思路,谢谢大家!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-1 09:17:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

The following appeared in a presentation by the chief production manager of a machine parts manufacturing company at a management meeting:
“Our factory in Cookville is our most advanced and efficient. It is capable of producing ten drill bits for each dollar of production costs, whereas none of our other factories can produce more than seven drill bits per dollar of production costs. Therefore, we can reduce our overall drill bit production costs by devoting the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production. Since reducing the production costs of individual machine parts is the only way to achieve our larger goal of reducing our overall production costs, dedicating the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production and shifting all other machine part production to our other factories will help us to attain that larger goal.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-12-1 10:57:06 | 只看该作者
看了半天才看懂drill bits 是个神马东东。。。
这个argument 的思路绕来绕去就是有three mojor flaws: reduce costs by devoting entirely drill bit production to C; the only way to reduce costs is to reduce production costs; shifting the production of the other parts to other factories is the appropriate way to go
针对这三个 direct or indirect conlusions 写就行了
1:  although C produce more bits per dollar, the reason may be that C has high- skilled workers,  total new and high- quality machines, or less amounts of orders(订单)  thus entirely shifting is fallacious, the results may be that the workers may be too tired and have too much burden, the machines would be worn out, and all this could contribute to the lowering of the productivity
2:  the management assumes without further more evidence that reucing the productions costs is the only way to enhance cost -effective production process: 可以train workers , 引进new technologies, 定期维修老旧设备,提高management strategy...
3: 就是转移制造这一部分:也许转移制造之后 cargo and transporting fees would roar因为sporadically 分布的 工厂可以及时供货,集中在一个地方不利于 供货, 而且shifting 牵扯到 搬家的费用:那些cumbersome machine怎么转移啊,人员怎么迁移啊。。。这些都是huge expense, may not weighover the elevation of the productivity
想到的也就这些, 希望能帮到你
板凳
发表于 2010-12-1 13:43:37 | 只看该作者
刚才又想到了一条:
生产drill bits 也许只占C工厂生产量的很少一部分,而C工厂大量出产的其他零件cost更低,margin远远大于drill bits,如果这样的话,只让c工厂生产drill bits就会得不偿失
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-1 18:34:30 | 只看该作者
思路很清晰,非常感谢!
5#
发表于 2010-12-1 19:40:09 | 只看该作者
不客气哇~明天就要杀鸡了。。。我也在看这个呢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 22:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部