ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2277|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

One Logic Reasoning Question

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-6 06:18:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Scientist: Some critcs of public funding for this research project have maintained that only if it can be indicated how the public will benefit from the project is continued public funding for it justified. If the critics were right about this, then there would not be tremendous public support for the project that even its critics acknowledge.

If the scientist's claims are true, which one of the following must also be true?

A) The benefits derived from the research project are irrelevant to whether or not its funding is justified
B) Continued public funding for the research project is justified
C) Public support for the research project is the surest indication of whether or not it is justified
D)There is trememdous public support for the research project because it can be indicated how the public will benefit from the project
E) That a public benefit can be indicated is not a requirement for the justification of the research project's continued public funding

Answer is E.

I can exclude ABCD, but why E?

Thanks
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-31 04:46:15 | 只看该作者
科学家的观点和some critics是不一样的。critics认为,That a public benefit can be indicated is a requirement for the justification of the research project's continued public funding。但是科学家反驳说,如果是这样的话,the project就不会获得那么多的支持了。
所以科学家认为,That a public benefit can be indicated is not a requirement for the justification of the research project's continued public funding。

要注意,问题说假设科学家说的是对的,那么科学家认为的那个不是必要条件,就是正确答案。这里面稍微有点绕。
板凳
发表于 2010-9-3 22:13:12 | 只看该作者
科学家说, 有的评论家认为如果一个研究计划无法使得公众得知有多受益,就不会受到公众的持续支持, 如果这个是对的, 那么那些(Even = 连...都/即使/恰好) 它的评论者 ( acknowledge = 承认/受益) 就不会有很多公众支持

上面两个关键词谁来给解释下......

E) That a public benefit can be indicated is not a requirement for the justification of the research project's continued public funding
科学家认为: 公众受益是否确定不是判断是否继续投资研究项目的所需理由
地板
发表于 2010-9-24 13:50:20 | 只看该作者
上面的牛人解释半天我咋看不懂,其实很简单!

就是一个三段论,哪有那么费劲!

大前提:support--->justified

小前提:?

结论:  no support

小前提就是:justification is not a requirement for ....

that's all
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 06:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部