ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1381|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GMAT一道逻辑题求解析

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-16 13:51:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.

-the opponents could effectively defend their position against the author's strategy by pointing out that:
A. the expertise of those opposing the law is outstanding.
B. the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoral.
C. the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cuts.
D. economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present law.
E. the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so

答案是选E,但是百思不得其解, 有谁能分析下这题吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-16 13:58:43 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 02:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部