Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
答案错误都知道 只是有个小问题: RON 对于A中 如果假设 coordinating 修饰 capitalized的分句
baby姐对于A选项我的疑惑点的看法:
OG的话是倒过来说,作者用了v-ing,要表达的意思就好像coordinating事件是capitalized事件的背景,而事实上这不合逻辑,是mixed up the timing.
来自manhattan第四版chapter 6有关modifier在这题的知识点:
Avoid long sequences of modifiers that modify the same noun. Putting two long modifiers in a row before or after a noun can lead to awkward or incorrect phrasings.
capitalized和coordinating不存在合理的逻辑修饰关系(Ron):
even if you interpret "carefully coordinating them..." as a modifier of the following clause, it doesn't make sense. specifically, it doesn't actually modify that clause: the fact that she coordinated her drawings with her stories has nothing to do with her love of the natural world.
不太明白 为什么说这里如果用ing分词修饰capitalized 假若成立 也依然毫无关系 我觉得按照 分词修饰的原则可以解答 后面capitalized 是通过 "how" 来解释的 :BP 利用了她对于大自然细致的观察和爱 通过 ("how" “怎样” ) ———— 他配了含有她的叙述的插图 来阐述的~~~饿 (说的有点含糊希望能明白) 就是感觉 后面的动作可以通过前面动作产生出的效果 有逻辑关系 。 就这个不太明白 希望能解答下 深夜发帖 求帮助!
|