ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4466|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解 OG13 130题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-23 23:26:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
130. Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, while in Germany it is just over 33 percent.

(C) whereas nuclear power accounts for just over 33 percent of the energy produced in Germany

(D) whereas just over 33 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany

哪位大神可以解释一下c、d选项,正确答案选C,可是我不知道D为什么错了,og解释的没看懂~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-23 23:34:13 | 只看该作者
all quote from manhattan




D选项为什么不对(用一个analogy来说明):
consider the following sentence:
over 80% of the energy in almonds comes from fat; by contrast, less than 10% of the energy comes from protein.
--> in this sentence, it should be pretty clear that "the energy"refers to "the energy in almonds".(so far so good.)


now, for where the trouble comes in:
over 80% of the energy in almonds comes from fat; less than 10% of the energy comes from protein in beef.
this sentence is ambiguous in the same way as the one you posted, but, because you've been "primed" for the meaning of the preceding sentence, it should be easier for you to see the ambiguity.
i.e., one interpretation of this sentence -- the interpretation in which "the energy" has the same significance as in the preceding sentence -- suggests that some percentage of the energy in almonds actually comes from beef!
the problem that you posted has the same issue.


搬回来原题(还是有点模糊?再看以下这个例子!)
It might be easier to see choice D as such (33 has been substituted with 25):


Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, whereas just over 25 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany.


Still a bad sentence needlessly to say, but the meaning is ambiguous and the sentence can easily be interpreted in a way different from its intention. Is it 75% of France's nuclear energy from France itself and the remaining 25% from Germany? Or is it merely stating a contrast of nuclear production between two countries?


Now, substitute with 33 with 25 in choice C and you will still retain the original intention of the sentence.





另一种理解:
D选项的错误(有点misplaced modifier的意思):
this sentence is written in a way whose meaning is at best ambiguous and at worst incorrect.

one possible meaning, if not the meaning, is that 33% of "the energy" (we don't know where this energy is, or where it's used) comes from "nuclear power in germany". i.e., the power itself is in germany (whatever that means), but "the energy" is we-don't-know-where.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-23 23:43:10 | 只看该作者
大神的第一种方法,替换成25理解,甚是好用啊。。。彻底明白了。。。跪谢了。。。
地板
发表于 2014-5-18 19:19:13 | 只看该作者
终于搞懂D选项了。。
5#
发表于 2014-7-12 03:53:17 | 只看该作者
顶这个25取代33的例子!!!
豁然开朗!!!
6#
发表于 2015-11-30 04:21:08 | 只看该作者
DUKB24 发表于 2012-10-23 23:34
all quote from manhattanD选项为什么不对(用一个analogy来说明):consider the following sentence: ove ...

Mark一下!               
7#
发表于 2015-11-30 04:21:37 | 只看该作者
DUKB24 发表于 2012-10-23 23:34
all quote from manhattanD选项为什么不对(用一个analogy来说明):consider the following sentence: ove ...

这个解释太赞了!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 21:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部