lsat-23-4-26

Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character, handwriting analysis called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses. Gregory: you are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.

/26. Which one of the following, if true, would provide Sasha with the strongest counter to Gregory’s response? (A) Courts routinely use means other than handwriting analysis to provide evidence of a person’s character. (B) Many people can provide two samples of their handwriting so different that only a highly trained professional could identify them as having been written by the same person. (C) A licensing board would inevitably refuse to grant licenses to some responsible handwriting analysts for reasons having nothing to do with their reliability. (D) The only handwriting analysts who claim that handwriting provides reliable evidence of a person’s character are irresponsible. (E) The number of handwriting analysts who could conform to professional standards set by a licensing board is very small.

这样的题我错了两次了，就是因为答案有个irresponsible或 responsible。我认为说主语是irresponsible还是responsible不能证明他的任意一个决定或者动作是错误的。 是不是？？？ 迷糊了？？

"我认为说主语是irresponsible还是responsible不能证明他的任意一个决定或者动作是错误的。 是不是？"

不太理解你的问题是什么意思

"D) The only handwriting analysts who claim that handwriting provides reliable evidence of a person’s character are irresponsible'--------------任何宣称"handwriting provides reliable evidence of a person’s character"的分析者是irresponsible

namely, D counters Gregory by saying that no responsible analysts would claim that handwring provides reliable evidence of a person's character. if one claims so, he must be irresponsible. The licensing system would be rendered useless.

釜底抽薪的驳斥

"irresponsible. 斑竹,我问的问题是,说一个人有没有责任感,难道就说这个人做的事情都不可能是对的么??? ,我想一个没有责任感的人也有作对事情的可能性把."--------it indeed is possible.

However, you would not disagree that an irresponsible analyst is more likely to make mistakes than a responsible one.Otherwise, how does a responsible person distinguish himself from an irresponsible person?  this is engough to counter George's view.