ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2206|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于“,-ing容易引起歧义的问题”

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-11 21:47:53 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
26. (25798-!-item-!-188;#058&002669)



A team of scientists has recently provided evidence of Earth being bombarded daily with as many

as 40,000 small comets, vaporizing in the upper atmosphere to fall to Earth as rain.



(A) of Earth being bombarded daily with as many as 40,000 small comets,vaporizing(又表示伴随状语修饰主句的歧义) in the upper atmosphere to修饰先行词作定语

(B) of Earth's being daily bombarded with as many as 40,000 small comets,vaporizing1.定语修饰名词2. 状语修饰句子——两个都合理的话:错误,产生了歧义)in the upper atmosphere and that

(C) that as much or more than 40,000 small comets daily bombard Earth, vaporizing in the upper

atmosphere, and

(D) that daily Earth is bombarded with as much or more than 40,000 small comets that vaporize in

the upper atmosphere and that

(E) that Earth is bombarded daily with as many as 40,000 small comets that vaporize in the upper

atmosphere and


如同答案所说,vaporizing可能修饰comets做定语,也可能修饰前面整个句子作状语。  我理解不了这两种修饰方式分别是表达了怎样的意思,求解答?   nn能不能给出一个翻译,作定语时这个句子是什么意思,作状语时候是什么意思?  谢谢了!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-11 22:21:43 | 只看该作者
顶。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-13 20:55:14 | 只看该作者
顶   求解答。想不出来这个歧义是怎么产生的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 12:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部