ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2872|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道比较有争议的题目:大全300,补充题212

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-23 16:07:00 | 只看该作者

一道比较有争议的题目:大全300,补充题212


212. Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.


(A) overtime that has the potential of causing


(B) overtime that has the potential to cause


(C) overtime that potentially can cause


(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing


(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause


这道题目大全中给出的答案是(E),对此好象争议比较大,一部分人认为应该选(D),因为根据OG159


159. While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners, whose equity—in many cases representing a life’s savings—can plunge or even disappear.


(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose


(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their


(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their


(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their


(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose


Choice A is the best. Its wording is unambiguous and economical. The plural pronoun they agrees with its antecedent, property values. The pronoun whose clearly refers to homeowners and efficiently connects them with the idea of lost equity. In B, C, and D, substituting in that their or because their for whose is wordy and confusing since the antecedent of their might be they, not homeowners. Furthermore, can potentially is redundant in B and E. Both D and E use the singular pronoun it, which does not agree with its logical antecedent, property values.


而支持选(E)的同志们则认为这两题是有差异的,他们觉得519中potentially修饰devastate,所以意思上和can重复,而212中potentially修饰can,所以不重复。另外,他们认为(D)中has the potential for doing的表达罗嗦,并且不准确。


详见帖子:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=193490&id=26366&star=1&skin=0


我认为说(E)中potentially和can不redundant的解释是很牵强的,因为就算potentially修饰can也存在语意重复的问题,况且,我们并没有足够的理由说159中的potentially一定是向后修饰的,我们也可以理解为是向前修饰can的。正如the pool is deceptively shallow这样的句子,由于无法弄清到底deceptively是修饰is还是修饰shallow,语法学家就认为这样的句子是存在歧义的一样。另外,关于has the potential for doing是罗嗦还是准确表达,我们有题为证,大全391


In large doses, analgesics that work in the brain as antagonists to certain chemicals have caused psychological disturbances in patients, which may limit their potential to relieve severe pain.


(A) which may limit their potential to relieve


(B) which may limit their potential for relieving


(C) which may limit such analgesics’ potential to relieve


(D) an effect that may limit their potential to relieve


(E) an effect that may limit the potential of such analgesics for relieving


正确答案是(E),如果这个答案没有错的话,那此题显然是在提示我们potential for doing是完全正确的表达。至于212中has the potential for causing是否意思正确,我觉得也毫无异议,“有发生的可能性”--何错之有?


所以,我强烈地怀疑大全中补充题212的答案给错了。

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-23 16:18:00 | 只看该作者

对不起,打错了


“有造成...后果的可能性”


但一样,何错之有?请高手指点

板凳
发表于 2006-4-26 15:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用trictincy在2006-4-23 16:07:00的发言:

所以,我强烈地怀疑大全中补充题212的答案给错了。


支持楼主的怀疑!

我查了牛津高阶,potential有固定搭配,potential for sth,如果后面要接动词,就只能换成potential for doing sth 了,

地板
发表于 2006-4-26 15:28:00 | 只看该作者
支持选E。理由如下:
1。potentially前后的逗号不可忽视,这说明potentially是个插入语,插入语是补充说明的作用,去掉也不影响句子原意的表达。而can potentially连在一起,连在一起我们即认为不可或缺,不像插入语那般可以去掉,can和potentially两个表达类似意思的词放在一起确实redundent无疑。
2。has the potential for doing个人认为并不是啰嗦表达,而是have the potential for doing sth通常用在褒义的表达中,potential作“潜力”解。212这题中要表达潜在的危害之意,不能用potential来表达。
5#
发表于 2006-10-4 20:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rosmarine在2006-4-26 15:28:00的发言:
支持选E。理由如下:
1。potentially前后的逗号不可忽视,这说明potentially是个插入语,插入语是补充说明的作用,去掉也不影响句子原意的表达。而can potentially连在一起,连在一起我们即认为不可或缺,不像插入语那般可以去掉,can和potentially两个表达类似意思的词放在一起确实redundent无疑。
2。has the potential for doing个人认为并不是啰嗦表达,而是have the potential for doing sth通常用在褒义的表达中,potential作“潜力”解。212这题中要表达潜在的危害之意,不能用potential来表达。

我的理解是GMAT的语法,每一个单词都有它的用处,否则一定要删掉不简洁,而作为插入语但又没表达出特别的意思,就应该删除掉。

6#
发表于 2007-2-14 20:52:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rosmarine在2006-4-26 15:28:00的发言:
支持选E。理由如下:
1。potentially前后的逗号不可忽视,这说明potentially是个插入语,插入语是补充说明的作用,去掉也不影响句子原意的表达。而can potentially连在一起,连在一起我们即认为不可或缺,不像插入语那般可以去掉,can和potentially两个表达类似意思的词放在一起确实redundent无疑。
2。has the potential for doing个人认为并不是啰嗦表达,而是have the potential for doing sth通常用在褒义的表达中,potential作“潜力”解。212这题中要表达潜在的危害之意,不能用potential来表达
赞一下!!疑惑尽去!!!
7#
发表于 2007-2-15 11:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rosmarine在2006-4-26 15:28:00的发言:
支持选E。理由如下:
1。potentially前后的逗号不可忽视,这说明potentially是个插入语,插入语是补充说明的作用,去掉也不影响句子原意的表达。而can potentially连在一起,连在一起我们即认为不可或缺,不像插入语那般可以去掉,can和potentially两个表达类似意思的词放在一起确实redundent无疑。
2。has the potential for doing个人认为并不是啰嗦表达,而是have the potential for doing sth通常用在褒义的表达中,potential作“潜力”解。212这题中要表达潜在的危害之意,不能用potential来表达。

 

potential to do 和 potential for sth/doing sth是一样吗?

8#
发表于 2009-1-8 11:26:00 | 只看该作者
up
9#
发表于 2009-7-22 21:57:00 | 只看该作者
up
10#
发表于 2010-5-10 12:54:30 | 只看该作者
也选了D。我觉得have the potential for causing errors应该解释为“造成错误的可能性”,potential不一定用在褒义情况下,比如牛津高阶中有个例句就是:she recognized the potential for error in the method being used.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 17:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部