ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11927|回复: 38
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Prep1-134-关于从句和分词修饰

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-3 14:07:00 | 只看该作者

Prep1-134-关于从句和分词修饰

Prep1-134:

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.

 

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend

(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending

(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend

(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending

(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

请问,如果A当中逗号去掉,答案会不会有变化。另外,从句和分词是本题的考点吗,请帮忙解释


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-3 14:08:17编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-7-6 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
逻辑意思错误,非并列,而是see的伴随
板凳
发表于 2008-7-7 00:43:00 | 只看该作者
comma都不是GMAC的考點
A中的"and spend"會有兩個並列的可能:
- union members are..., and spend less time with each.
- ...doctors to see ..., and spend...
如果一個choice有分歧, 很有可能是錯, 再看看別的choice, 看有沒有好一點的 =)
地板
发表于 2008-7-20 15:45:00 | 只看该作者
spending做see伴随状语
5#
发表于 2009-2-23 15:31:00 | 只看该作者

这个spending做从句中的一个非谓语动词的伴随状语?

分词做伴随状语不都是修饰整个句子吗?

请大家帮忙解释一下,谢谢!

6#
发表于 2009-2-24 15:22:00 | 只看该作者
再请大牛帮忙解释一下,为什么spending这里做从句的一个非谓语动词的伴随状语?这种现象普遍吗?
7#
发表于 2009-2-24 15:36:00 | 只看该作者
我认为这里如果用spending做伴随状语的话,语法结构上优先修饰主句谓语动词结构be likely to be enrolled,但这个逻辑意义明显是不正确的。
8#
发表于 2009-2-25 00:50:00 | 只看该作者

显然被选项的内容应该是修饰plans的。从这个角度看,plans只会 impose stricter limits ... and require doctors ... 不会spend ...,所以需要impose / require 平行,而spend不能平行,这样排除BCE,剩下AD。相比D好一点,所以这题是不是就是体现选最优的策略呢

如果D改为 that impose .... and require doctors to see more patients and (to) spend (less time with each.) 即将to see 和 to spend对应,是不是更好一点

继续请教大家

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend

(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending

(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend

(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending

(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

9#
发表于 2009-2-25 01:05:00 | 只看该作者
我一开始错选了E,因为觉得requiring doctors to see more patients和spending less time with each other并列。

但其实,"doing....结构置于句末,做结果或是伴随状态,动做的发出者必须是前一句话的主句,在这里是insurans plan, 但是insurance  plan是不可以spend搭配。


但,反过来说,
impose stricter limits on medical services和require doctors to see more patients并列,多多少少不那么好,两者明明是 手段 和 结果(内容)的关系。

所以,
我在同意Mayanist的看法基础上,我觉得这里如果改成 requiring doctors to see....and to....更好。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-25 1:08:22编辑过]
10#
发表于 2009-2-25 01:25:00 | 只看该作者
我觉个改为 to see and to spend对应不好,这样的表达可以理解为不相关的两个目的。强调不出 to see 与此同时 to spend 意味。

置于现在分词的修饰对象,
修饰语位置应尽量遵循“紧接被修饰成分”的原则。
现在分词作状语放在句末,按照接近性原则,应优先修饰靠近它的谓语,这个谓语可能不是主句的谓语。
正如你所说的,通过逻辑判断 spending 并无修饰其他动词的歧义,所以 spending 只能修饰 to see

关于修饰语总结
请看大 N, lyricling 的大作
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=9076

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 04:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部