ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1998|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请求讲解GWD6-Q6

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-2 19:07:00 | 只看该作者

请求讲解GWD6-Q6

GWD6-Q6:

      According to a theory advanced

       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave

       of species extinctions that occurred

Line       in North America about 11,000 years

  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,

can be directly attributed to the arrival

of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who

were ancestors of modern Native

Americans.  However, anthropologist

 (10)      Shepard Krech points out that large

animal species vanished even in areas

where there is no evidence to demon-

strate that Paleoindians hunted them.

Nor were extinctions confined to large

 (15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and

insects disappeared, presumably not

all through human consumption.  Krech

also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of

climatic change as an explanation by

 (20)      asserting that widespread climatic

       change did indeed occur at the end of

       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes

secondary if not primary responsibility

for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,

 (25)      arguing that humans have produced

local extinctions elsewhere.  But,

according to historian Richard White,

even the attribution of secondary

responsibility may not be supported

 (30)      by the evidence.  White observes that

Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding

dates for the arrival of humans and the

       decline of large animal species, and

Krech, though aware that the dates

 (35)      are controversial, does not challenge

them; yet recent archaeological

discoveries are providing evidence

that the date of human arrival was

much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

Q6:

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?

             

  1. Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed
  2. New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct
  3. Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras
  4. Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed
  5. New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

Answer: B  为什么是B,我选的C,请帮助解答。我觉得B没有削弱,根据原文small animals, plants, and

insects disappeared, presumably not

all through human consumption. 

insects disappeared, presumably not

all through human consumption. 

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-3 10:24:00 | 只看该作者

怎么没有人回答我

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-3 10:25:00 | 只看该作者
自己顶顶
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-3 10:25:00 | 只看该作者

NN来帮我看看吧

 

5#
发表于 2010-4-12 14:48:04 | 只看该作者
我觉得B的削弱应当抓得文章关键词是small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption,一楼的 where there is no evidence是针对大动物。


对于C,我当时也十分迷惑。我是这样想的, C当中的in previous and subsequent eras,也就是说是不在Pleistocene era的气候变化。可是你想,在Pleistocene era之前或者之后的era的天气变化并不能说明Pleistocene era的物种的灭绝啊,因为在这些era本来就没有Pleistocene era时代的物种啊。而C还说到not only at the end of the Pleistocene era,也就是强调了在P时代末是有天气变化的,也就加强了K的说法。
有点拗口,希望你能明白。
------------------引自zhongyukai
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-13 22:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部