ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1742|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og10th 70. 我觉得用can not 比unable好,可答案不是??

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-16 01:02:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
70. A President entering the final two years of a second term is likely to be at a severe disadvantage and often unable to carry out a legislative program.
likely to be at a severe disadvantage and is often unable to
likely severely disadvantaged and often unable to
liable to be severely disadvantaged and cannot often
liable that he or she is at a severe disadvantage and cannot often
at a severe disadvantage, often likely to be unable that he or she can


答案是a,我觉得a的unable 不好,unable表示能力,我觉得前面强调的final two years of a second term是为了说明总统不能够的原因而不是能力不行,如果指能力的问题,那第一任就能体现出来了啊,请教为什么还选unable呢?为什么不选c呢?at a severe disadvantage是比everely disadvantaged好,但是everely disadvantaged也没错啊。为什么呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-2-16 04:09:46 | 只看该作者
个人觉得这种题目一般比较选项就可以。题目中给的关键词为likely,而不是liable,所以首先不可以随便改变原句的词,其次,原题的错误明显在and并列处.至于E选项,句子结构以及语义都和原文相差很多,肯定不选这样的选项!
板凳
发表于 2010-2-16 12:09:12 | 只看该作者
情态动词不能随意增加,原句没有用,那么选项中也不能增加。
be able to 和CAN 也有区别的,前者强调没有(某项)能力,后者更强调无法去做(主观情感上),且E项不仅罗嗦,还更改了LIKELY
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-18 09:23:46 | 只看该作者
太感谢了,这回明白了,呵呵
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 05:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部