ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3500|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]gwd16-31

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-4 20:56:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]gwd16-31

Q31:

答案选E,A哪里错了?E中的时态对吗?

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

 

A.                              Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
        

B.                              Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C.                             Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

D.                             Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E.                              Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

 

 

 

沙发
发表于 2007-3-5 23:08:00 | 只看该作者

我也觉得A没有错

板凳
发表于 2007-3-6 08:46:00 | 只看该作者

A is wrong.

I would like to see more people give their feedbacks before I explain why it is wrong.

地板
发表于 2007-3-6 09:43:00 | 只看该作者

单纯从语法角度讲,A 可以说没有问题.

但是如果选择A,句子的重心有问题:

原句应强调的是letters.....outnumber(即, 谓语动词应为outnumber),而不是这些信的书写时间(没有意义,且逻辑略显模糊).所以 "...were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886"应为修饰letters的定语从句,最好为非限定性定语从句(因为可以拿掉)的主体---就缺引导词了.

E解决了这个问题;本身时态似乎也没有问题,因为说的是一个事实.

可以这样理解吗?

 

5#
发表于 2007-3-7 10:57:00 | 只看该作者

马甲怎么还不来回答呢???

偶很想知道你的精辟见解!~~~~

 

6#
发表于 2007-3-7 23:25:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用yulinling在2007-3-6 9:43:00的发言:

单纯从语法角度讲,A 可以说没有问题.

但是如果选择A,句子的重心有问题:

原句应强调的是letters.....outnumber(即, 谓语动词应为outnumber),而不是这些信的书写时间(没有意义,且逻辑略显模糊).所以 "...were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886"应为修饰letters的定语从句,最好为非限定性定语从句(因为可以拿掉)的主体---就缺引导词了.

E解决了这个问题;本身时态似乎也没有问题,因为说的是一个事实.

可以这样理解吗?

 

 

我觉得不可以这样理解。如果只是重心的问题,通常ETS的解释都是E改变了原句的重心,你这样解释好像是在往正确答案上靠。只是个人看法,不知道对不对。

马甲哥哥快来给我们讲讲吧~

7#
发表于 2007-3-8 11:35:00 | 只看该作者

我回来了。这两天太忙了。对不起。呵呵。。。

Whenever you see the V+ing of this kind, you need to know that it happens for a reason. There must be a causual relationship in the whole sentence. In other words, you can rewrite the sentence in the following way: Because .....,(then).......

Now take a look at choice A, and rearrange it according to the above format:

 Because Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period...., (they) outnumbered......

Does it have a causual relationship? No. It doesn't make sense at all. So A is out for good.

8#
发表于 2007-3-8 12:18:00 | 只看该作者
还有,这类题说起来简单,在操作上还是非常迷惑,因为看上去是没有语法mistakes de.
9#
发表于 2007-3-8 13:27:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用avimi在2007-3-7 23:25:00的发言:

我觉得不可以这样理解。如果只是重心的问题,通常ETS的解释都是E改变了原句的重心,你这样解释好像是在往正确答案上靠。只是个人看法,不知道对不对。

 

马甲哥哥的解释果然精彩.

也许"重心"一词用的不好",抱歉!!!  

这就是一道句意题(或语法逻辑题), 试着理解句意会发现A 的表达的不清爽.

两个选项语法都没有错误的时候(前提是能分辨出来),只能是哪个表达的"更准确,更清楚,更简洁(不一定是更短)",那个更正确.

没有这个提防,遇到这样的题很容易错.

无他,一个善意的提示.

10#
发表于 2007-3-8 13:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用我是马甲哥哥在2007-3-8 11:35:00的发言:

我回来了。这两天太忙了。对不起。呵呵。。。

Whenever you see the V+ing of this kind, you need to know that it happens for a reason. There must be a causual relationship in the whole sentence. In other words, you can rewrite the sentence in the following way: Because .....,(then).......

Now take a look at choice A, and rearrange it according to the above format:

 Because Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period...., (they) outnumbered......

Does it have a causual relationship? No. It doesn't make sense at all. So A is out for good.

相信官方也是这样解释的!~

 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-26 16:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部