ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4192|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于OG12-1修饰的疑惑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-15 22:06:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG12-1
The Glass House Mountains in Queensland, Australia, were sighted in 1770 by the English navigator Captain James Cook, by whom they were named supposedly because its sheer we rocks glistened like glass.

A. by whom they were named supposedly because its
B. by whom they were named supposedly and their
C. naming them supposedly since their
D. who so named them supposedly because their
E. who so named it since supposedly their

不管C选项中since的问题 也不考虑逻辑主语的问题  
naming...后面的部分 为什么不能够作为分词形式的定语修饰James Cook呢 (如果不将后面的部分看做逻辑主语)

谢谢大家
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-11-15 22:18:35 | 只看该作者
present participle位于句尾更倾向于理解为伴随/结果状语.
所以naming引导状语,自然就要其伴随的动词,再找逻辑主语了...于是找到了mountains,于是就错了.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-15 22:42:38 | 只看该作者
In the mid-1920s the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company was the scene of an intensive series of experiments that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance.

(A) that would investigate changes in working conditions as to their effects on workers' performance
(B) investigating the effects that changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance
(C) for investigating what the effects on workers' performance are that changes in working conditions would cause
(D) that investigated changes in working conditions' effects on workers' performance
(E) to investigate what the effects changes in working conditions would have on workers' performance

(B)

prep笔记内容:
逻辑表达,现在分词结构在句尾可作定语修饰紧临的名词,也可作状语修饰整个句子,所以在这种情况下需要特别注意,通常优先作定语修饰名词,如果不符合逻辑,则是作状语修饰句子,如果二者都能理解符合逻辑,则说明该分词结构有修饰歧义。


The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing canals so that the water now empties into the Mississippi by way of the Illinois River.

(A) Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constructing
(B) Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they have been redirected by constructing
(C) Rivers, which originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan but have been redirected by the construction of
(D) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by the construction of
(E) Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, have been redirected through the construction of
 (E)
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-15 22:45:58 | 只看该作者
额 编辑出了些问题   笔记内容应该放在最后面        

因为OG里面直接将naming...作为伴随状语处理了  
但是没有提到是否能够作为定语修饰前面的人名
所以有些疑惑  

并且由于作为伴随状语这一条由于逻辑主语的原因而不成立 那么便只能作为定语修饰前面的名词..所以不存在修饰歧义的问题

谢谢斑竹的回复  
5#
发表于 2009-11-15 23:01:18 | 只看该作者
除了前面是主系表结构,现在分词结构前面用逗号隔开,放在句尾都是做状语的。
6#
发表于 2009-11-20 20:47:02 | 只看该作者
额 编辑出了些问题   笔记内容应该放在最后面        

因为OG里面直接将naming...作为伴随状语处理了  
但是没有提到是否能够作为定语修饰前面的人名
所以有些疑惑  

并且由于作为伴随状语这一条由于逻辑主语的原因而不成立 那么便只能作为定语修饰前面的名词..所以不存在修饰歧义的问题

谢谢斑竹的回复  
-- by 会员 葵之夏影 (2009/11/15 22:45:58)

请问你明白为什么不能做定语修饰前面J.C了吗?我还没明白啊。。。请指教?嘻嘻

另那个since是因为什么不对呢?不可以表因果关系吗?OG 的解释我没看太明白。。。
7#
发表于 2009-11-30 21:34:01 | 只看该作者
这个也有疑问,有没有nn解释一下
8#
发表于 2009-11-30 21:43:59 | 只看该作者
觉得since不如because好,会有歧义的 since还有“自从...”的意思
9#
发表于 2009-12-3 17:44:39 | 只看该作者
除了前面是主系表结构,现在分词结构前面用逗号隔开,放在句尾都是做状语的。
-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2009/11/15 23:01:18)



这个有出处么?
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-17 20:03:59 | 只看该作者
除了前面是主系表结构,现在分词结构前面用逗号隔开,放在句尾都是做状语的。
-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2009/11/15 23:01:18)



这个有出处么?
-- by 会员 红尘道士 (2009/12/3 17:44:39)





同问  老帖子了 顶出来

斑斑能回答下下么  谢谢了啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 19:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部