- UID
- 319046
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-2-24
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
OG12—21
Neuroscientists, havingamassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about thebrain and its development from birth to adulthood,are now drawing solid conclusions about how human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
D Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about thebrain and its development from birth to adulthood,
OG对D的解释是The final descriptor in present tense, now drawing conclusion ... does not fit the opening clause, which is in present-perfect tense (have amassed a wealth ...) and seems to modify adulthood. 也就是说这里的doing作定语修饰前面的adulthood。
OG 66
The 32 species that make up the dolphin family are closely related to whales and in fact include the animal known as the killer whale, which can grow to be 30 feet long and is famous for its aggressive hunting pods. B include the animal known as the killer whale, growing as big as 30 feet long and
先撇开B中as big as ... long不谈,OG对B的解释是 Changing the verb to the participial growing introduces ambiguity, because it could refer back to the subject of the sentence (32 species).
为什么到了这一题里growing就不能作定语修饰前面的killer whale?
我本来对n. ,doing中doing做定语还是状语的理解是:假设做定语,修饰前面的名词是否讲得通(21题)再假设做定语逻辑主语是前面的句子或者句子主语,修饰主句的动作看讲得通(66题)。
但是现在被OG对这两题的解释给完全搞迷糊了。GMAC到底是说能只能做状语,还是说(不管句子意思)又能状语又能定语所以是歧义所可以直接排除?? |
|