谢谢这么详细的解答!第一题,关于逻辑主语,我还是比较迷惑的,一般要怎么去看呢? 还有就是在这一题里," what had previously been horse feed restored market equilibrium" 这句话到底是什么意思呢~我读着觉得听别扭的~还请同学指教! -- by 会员 deng2y (2009/12/16 1:23:42)
一般情况下,在主句的某一从属成分中,出现动词(一般以动名词,现在分词,过去分词的形式出现)但未出现发出该动作的主体,此时就要考虑发出该动作的逻辑主语是否就是主句中的实际主语,不一致就是错. 例如: by persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed, market equilibrium was restored by persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed是介词结构作主句的方式壮语,by 后面的persuading是动名词,此时就要考虑persuade的逻辑主语,显然不是market,所以就跟主句中的主语market出现不一致. 而英语语法要求这两者必须一致. 这是个很简单的语法点,但GMAT还考得挺多.
persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed restored market equilibrium 通过说服人们去吃那些先前是马粮的农作物可以重新使市场达到均衡 整个题干的意思大致是说一个主流观点认为,由于越来越多的人买车导致马匹数量急剧减少,因而那些喂马的农作物就过剩了, 这样, 通过说服人们去吃那些先前是马粮的农作物可以重新使市场达到均衡
|