ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1694|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问2个题目 想死了~~求助

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-6 15:31:00 | 只看该作者

问2个题目 想死了~~求助

第一个是149. Last year, land values in most parts of the pinelands rose almost
so fast. and in some parts even faster than what they did outside the
pinelands.
(A) so fast, and in some parts even faster than what they did
(B) so fast, and in some parts even faster than, those
(C) as fast, and in some parts even faster than, those
(D) as fast as, and in some parts even faster than, those
(E) as fast as, and in some parts even faster than what they did

答案D后面为什么不要did啊,如果加了可以吗?
还有一个是

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,


答案A后面的which是直接修饰technique吗?可是后面的错误答案的解释都提到 错误答案中的which是直接修饰前面的emssion了

我怎么看都差和A的格式差不多,为什么A就是对的呢~

which从句是不是修饰紧跟着他的东西?


感谢你们宝贵的时间,我复习得快奔溃了..帮帮我



[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/6 15:33:33编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-10-6 15:46:00 | 只看该作者
第一题我觉得是可以加did的,和前面的rose对应;
第二题CD的called短语位置错误,应该紧跟在technique后面。
当然如果要说which修饰的是technique,那么CD在中间加入了originally developed...,把technique和which隔的太远了,没有A好;
如果要说which修饰的是emission,就没有问题,但是CD中called短语位置错误,所以还是A意思最明确。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-6 19:42:00 | 只看该作者
有点理解了,万分感谢
地板
发表于 2009-10-29 17:08:00 | 只看该作者
D有点问题即使加了did还是多了一个逗号
5#
发表于 2009-10-29 17:45:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得those后面不应该加did,因为those是指代land values,应紧跟它的修饰语outside the
pinelands. did应加在outside the pinelands的后面。

如有不妥,请多多指正。

6#
发表于 2009-10-30 09:54:00 | 只看该作者

两个主语比较嘛,加不加did都行,不是绝对错误。同意amumu

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-3 04:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部