ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1659|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

'That' or 'which'? from OXFORD dicitonaries

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-17 23:36:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
'That' or 'which'?Do you sometimes wonder whether to use that or which in a sentence? In many cases, in British English, both words are equally correct.
√ She held out the hand which was hurt.
√ She held out the hand that was hurt.

In these sentences, that and which are introducing what’s known as arestrictive relative clause. This is a clause containing essential information about the noun that comes before it. If you leave out this type of clause, the meaning of the sentence is affected – indeed, it will probably not make much sense at all. Restrictive relative clauses can be introduced by that, which, whose, who, or whom.

The other type of relative clause is known as anon-restrictive relative clause. This kind of clause contains extra information that could be left out of the sentence without affecting the meaning or structure. Non-restrictive clauses can be introduced by which, whose, who, or whom, but you should never use that to introduce them. For example:


A list of contents would have made it easier to steer through the book, which also lacks a map.
She held out her hand, which Rob shook.

Note that a non-restrictive clause is preceded by a comma (so as to set off the extra information), whereas no comma should precede a restrictive clause (indicating that the information is essential, not extra):
I bought a new dress, which I will be wearing to Jo's party. [non-restrictive]
I was wearing the dress that I bought to wear to Jo's party. [restrictive]
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-18 00:32:21 | 只看该作者
in a word,that用于限定性修饰,which限定性或非限定性修饰都
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 08:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部