ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1952|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

請問大全391

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-1-10 21:25:00 | 只看该作者

請問大全391

391.In large doses, analgesics that work in the brain as antagonists to certain chemicals have caused psychological disturbances in patients, which may limit their potential to relieve severe pain.
(a)which may limit their potential to relieve
(B) which may limit their potential for relieving
(C) which may limit such analgesics’ potential to relieve
(D) an effect that may limit their potential to relieve
(E) an effect that may limit the potential of such analgesics for relieving

請問這題在(d)(e)中為何(e)是對的?
沙发
发表于 2004-1-10 23:53:00 | 只看该作者
D中their有指代不清的问题。GMAT中有很多这样的题,必须把指代的东西说清楚,防止歧义。
板凳
发表于 2004-3-1 03:18:00 | 只看该作者
IN E, why 'for releiving ...' not ' to relieve'?

地板
发表于 2004-4-23 18:10:00 | 只看该作者

Webster:

potential: n.something that can develop or become actual  

a potential for violence  

所以我认为For是固定搭配.  

5#
发表于 2009-7-24 16:38:00 | 只看该作者
up
6#
发表于 2009-8-30 17:31:00 | 只看该作者
可是我在longman上查到,potential of 的eg:the potential of the Internet to create jobs
7#
发表于 2009-8-30 18:18:00 | 只看该作者
D犯的是正确性错误,E用的for relieving只是有效性错误,相比之下E更优
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 05:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部