ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3814|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD2-34 关于presuming的用法

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-31 16:37:00 | 只看该作者

GWD2-34 关于presuming的用法

Q34:

NASA’s methodical approach to the exploration of Mars has not yet answered the questions of whether biological life forms ever emerged on Mars and whether, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with, those traces can
                        
still exist in some moist recesses of the cold and arid planet.

 A.and whether, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with, those traces can
                        

 A.and whether, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with, those traces can
                

and whether, presuming such life forms having left fossil traces to begin with, those traces can
    

B.and whether, if it is presumed that such life forms left some fossil traces to begin with, can those traces
        

C.and whether, presuming such life forms left fossil traces to begin with, those traces
        

D.and, presuming such life forms did leave some fossil traces to begin with, if they can
        

E.and, presuming such life forms to have left fossil traces to begin with, if they

答案是C     可是我查不到presuming的用法 想请教各位nn presuming可不可以直接看成if来理解 其后面要根句子呢

谢谢啦~~

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-31 19:10:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2009-9-1 12:55:00 | 只看该作者

不是nn,这道题我也错了,我选的C

据我理解,presuming只是做伴随状态用,presume是个及物动词,可等于 assume 或 presuppose,要注意的是它是个动词,这里应该做假定的意思讲,没有if里那种的条件的意味吧....

但persum可以加that从句,也可以加to do sth~

 

不过正解还要等NN来下,问题应该出在can是否应该保留,以及left的被动上...等待NN给正解~
地板
发表于 2009-9-2 07:20:00 | 只看该作者

Scientists claim that the discovery of the first authenticated 可鉴别的
        
mammal bones in amber琥珀 could provide important clues of determining, in addition to how, when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies.

 

A.      of determining, in addition to how, when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies

B.       in the determination of how and when the islands of the West Indies were colonized by mammals

C.      to determine how mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies and when they did

D.      for determining when the islands of the West Indies were colonized by mammals and how they were

E.       for determining how and when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies

我开始也选C。但是C有一个致命点:就是前后冗长,意思不清。when they did到底是did什么。

比较E中的how and when XXXX就表达清晰多了。

但是这里有一个疑点,就是到底是应该to determine 还是for determining.

其实在表达中,如果是无生命的东西要要表达目的的话,最好是用for doing.

例子:technology for preventing

9. GWD28-Q9:

Early in the twentieth century, Lake
                    Konfa
became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive
复苏
            
pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A.      Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

B.       Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.

C.      There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake
                    Konfa
.

D.      Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

E.       The species of fish that are present in Lake
                    Konfa
now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

Open for discussion.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 13:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部