ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2055|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] OG2017-SC730-Lucretia Mott

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-1-31 19:39:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
答案是E
关于 Lucretia Mott这题我有一个问题,
E选项中出现了两个for, argued for 和for women,为什么不会有for changes与for women 错误并列的歧义呢?
我在做题的时候首先就排除了有两个for的选项...求解答




收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-2-1 09:08:25 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-2-1 10:36:40 | 只看该作者
幻北 发表于 2017-2-1 09:08
a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married ...

这样看来equal rights for changes确实说不通,感谢解答,
地板
发表于 2017-2-1 20:17:58 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2017-2-2 11:02:04 | 只看该作者
幻北 发表于 2017-2-1 20:17
不客气,以后有问题尽管问哦

好啊~ 手动比心~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 00:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部