ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3023|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 【Thursday with Ron】modifier----对于comma+V-ed/comma+adj.修饰对象的疑惑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-8-3 12:45:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Famed for his masterful use of irony, many of Guy de Maupassant's short stories have become classics due to the author slowly revealing at the end of each piece a tragic twist of fate.

A. Famed for his masterful use of irony, many of Guy de Maupassant's short stories have become classics due to the author slowly revealing at the end of each piece a tragic twist of fate.

B. Many of Guy de Maupassant's short stories have become classics because of how he famously and masterfully uses irony, evident in the slow revelation of a tragic twist of fate at the end of each piece.

C. Famed for using irony in a masterful way, many of Guy de Maupassant's short stories have become classics because of the author slowly revealing a tragic twist of fate at the end of each piece.

D. Many of Guy de Maupassant's short stories have become classics because of the author's famed and masterful use of irony, evidenced in the slow revelation of a tragic twist of fate at the end of each piece.

E. Many of Guy de Maupassant's short stories have become classics because he slowly revealed a tragic twist of fate at the end of each piece, demonstrating his famed and masterful use of irony






题目来自Thursday with Ron的2012-01-05,正确答案选D
A&C Famed for his masterful use of irony, 修饰的是many of Guy de Maupassant's short stories,错误
B&E he不能代指Guy de Maupassant's,后者是一个形容词,错误


对B&D有一个疑惑
B选项:evident in the slow revelation of a tragic twist of fate at the end of each piece=====>这句话修饰的为什么不是主语,而是irony?
D选项:evidenced in the slow revelation of a tragic twist of fate at the end of each piece=====>V-ed过去分词作状语,不是应该修饰的是主语吗?但是这选项正确的话,那么evidenced....修饰的就是irony
这里对他们的修饰对象不是很懂耶


对于这样的modifier(comma+V-ed或者comma+adj.),还有什么规则吗?是否还和放置位置有关?求各位大佬解释,谢谢~


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2018-8-5 22:08:45 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下TAT
板凳
发表于 2018-8-12 11:25:33 | 只看该作者
也是刚刚听完这节课。。试着讨论一下~
adj.和,v-ed应该都是noun modifier,尽量touch 它修饰的modifier,而且从句意来看修饰irony非常合理
但是我又想到有一个问题,不知道COMMA+v-ed和COMMA+v-ing是否有区别,后者能修饰preceding clause,不知道前者行不行
希望有NN来帮忙解答~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 02:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部