ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3249|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教一个1月份AWA的高频作文题:B5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-1-6 10:56:00 | 只看该作者

求教一个1月份AWA的高频作文题:B5

这个在黄金八十里面没有找到~我郁闷了半天,所以还是上来集众人之所长好了~

The primary responsibility of citizens is to obey their nation’s civil and criminal laws.

我写了半天写不下去了,实在水平有限啊~拜托各位了~我把我的文章顺便也贴上来,大家看看好了,写的不好,大家见笑哈~

In this issue, the author make an assertion that the primary responsibility of citizens is to obey their nation’s civil and criminal laws. To some extend, I quite agree with the point that citizens has responsibility to obey their nation’s civil and criminal laws. However, it’s unreasonable to assert that this responsibility is the primary one for all the citizens. It’s illogical to make such an extreme conclusion. On balance, my standpoint will be detailedly described in the following discussion.

 

To begin with, society is composed by citizens, each should obey to nation’s civil and criminal laws. For example, somebody steals other’s money, he or she will be accused according to civil laws. Based on the criminal law, people will be guilty of murder if they kill a person. In order to ensure our society’s safety, all citizens should obey our nation’s civil and criminal laws. Otherwise, we will live in an disorder world. Hence, it’s necessary for all the citizens to obey their nation’s civil and criminal laws.

 

Secondly, the speaker unnecessarily extend this issue to an irrevocable extreme. It’s unreasonable to make an conclusion that the responsibility to obey nation’s civil and criminal laws is the primary responsibility for all the citizens.

 

In conclusion, the issue appears to be logical at first glance. However, it’s somehow unreasonable after a careful examination. Hence, it’s a complex issue, requiring our subjective judgement. According to my analysis above, people should obey their nation’s civil and criminal laws. But this responsibility is not the primary one for citizens.

如果大家看到有没写下去的地方,就是我写不下去的地方啦~嘎嘎~麻烦大家帮忙看看,谢谢了~

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-1-6 18:47:00 | 只看该作者

为嘛没人回我呢?我写的太差了么?哭~

板凳
发表于 2008-1-8 15:18:00 | 只看该作者

一点个人意见,仅供参考哈。

首先说文章结构,你第3段才2句话,太少了吧。而且你的观点是否定obey laws is the primary resp,但你大部分的文章(第2段整段)都在说obey laws,真正到第3段该support你的观点时又只有2句话。

其次是语言,有不少不正确或不恰当的词和句子。e.g.

unreasonable 语气太强烈;illogical好像也不大合适;

detailedly described in the following discussion 还不如直接说 will be discussed in detail below.

he or she will be accused according to civil laws,accuse 用的不对,要用charge; people will be guilty of murder,不对,will be charged of murder

我还有一个疑问,这个句子"extend broader assertion to irrevocable extreme"我看到好几次了,估计是模板句,但我真是觉得不通阿

最后,我对这个issue的看法:我同意这个观点。主要就是考虑到 stability of the society 的问题。这样的题目很抽象,真的很难写很多东西。

地板
发表于 2008-11-11 15:51:00 | 只看该作者
哈哈,我觉得这个MM好可爱:题目是问B5,贴上来一个B1;贴上来的文章短短的,我一眼看过去以为是模板呢...
5#
发表于 2009-7-19 13:22:00 | 只看该作者

!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-4 07:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部