ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1790|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-50

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-13 22:02:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence "that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come" in for a "soft landing,"followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

A.that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come
B. in the economy to avoid the recession,what many feared earlier in the year,rather to come

正解是A.可是我觉得A里面的时态有点问题,had feared 改成feared,是不是用过去时更好?还有,B选项哪里错误,OG对B的解释看不太懂,望大虾指点!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-16 20:17:23 | 只看该作者
up!仍然请教A选项的时态问题,为什么不能用过去时?
板凳
发表于 2010-9-16 20:43:10 | 只看该作者
A的时态我也没有搞清楚

B的错误都是很明显的
1. rather 不能当连词用,所以rather 前面还得加个 and
2. OG解释“what cannot replace that”, 我记得在前面的语法笔记中提到,在GMAT中,指代物只能用that or which,至于what指代什么,我还要查一下

希望NN们能指点下,GMAT中 what 的用法
地板
发表于 2010-9-19 10:55:54 | 只看该作者
Question: Why THAT (the one after RECESSION) cannot be omitted?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 23:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部