[求助]OG50

That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A)  That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

(B)  That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

(C)  It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

(D)  It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology

(E)  The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said

Grammatical construction

Although it is possible to begin a sentence with a subordinate clause beginning with that, this inverted construction often results in errors such as those found here. In the original sentence, the subordinate clause that ... technology is followed by the main verb, can ... be said, but then the verb is followed by yet another subordinate clause, that it is their fault. The best way to solve this problem is by putting the sentence in the expected order, with the main clause (It can hardly be said) preceding the subordinate clause (that ... ). For greater clarity and concision, the two subordinate clauses should be condensed into one: educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology.

不明白原句错在哪了~？解释没太懂，为什么倒装结构中就不能同时有一个主语从句和一个宾语从句呢？

好~谢谢斑竹