ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1191|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全222的问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-11 22:38:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.


(A) enabling it to with hold from the public


(B) for it to with hold from the public


(C) for with holding disclosure to the public of


(D) that enable them to with hold from public disclosure


(E) that they can with hold public disclosure of


Choice A is best: enabling ... clearly modifies powers, it refers logically and grammatically to the Central Intelligence Agency, and to withhold from the public is concisely and idiomatically phrased. In choices B and C, the preposition for is used unidiomatically in place of the "-ing" modifier to introduce the phrase describing powers. In choices C, D, and E, with holding ... disclosure is wordy and imprecise, since it is really the identities that are to be withheld. The plural pronouns them in D and they in E do not agree with the singular Agency, and that in E mistakenly introduces a new independent clause rather than a modifying phrase for powers.
请问 the identities of its sources of intelligence information.在这句中的作用?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-12 09:35:59 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-19 22:32:21 | 只看该作者
地板
发表于 2012-11-19 22:38:36 | 只看该作者
额。。。。withhold sth from sb,这里因为sth太长,所以放在后面了。。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 14:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部