ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2736|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

885 sec-E-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-18 09:57:00 | 只看该作者

885 sec-E-11

The man was always aware, sometimes proudly and sometimes resentfully, that he was a small-town Midwesterner who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him.fficeffice" />



(A) who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him



(B) who had been thrust into a world that was dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him



(C) who had been thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and people more polished than he was



(D) thrust into a world dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him



(E) thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he



答案是E,可是我选了C,我觉得he 后的was 不该省,但是,who had been.......又仿佛累赘.比较级的时候,何时谓语可以省,何时谓语不可以省?哪位大侠给讲讲啊。谢谢^^*









[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-18 10:00:15编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2004-2-18 10:27:00 | 只看该作者
原文的意思是说统治世界的人比he更加(wealthier, better-educated, and more polished ), 如果补出was,要么是he和world that was比较,逻辑上根本不通;要么是he和Midwesterner who was比较,可是有没有比较级的adj;

板凳
发表于 2004-2-18 10:48:00 | 只看该作者
此题读题时就觉的累赘,当看到D,E时,就觉的特别舒服啊,用简洁的分词取代累赘的分句,又不改变句意,一个字,爽!
地板
发表于 2004-2-18 16:29:00 | 只看该作者
1, in the structure 'that(who) +be + adj ', 'that(who) +be' must be omitted


2, 'than he was' -- most of the times, 'was' should not be omitted. however, it can be omitted when there is only one subject and a verb. the bottomline is that the omission won't cause imbiguity.

5#
发表于 2004-2-19 12:59:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sweetcorn在2004-2-18 9:57:00的发言:

The man was always aware, sometimes proudly and sometimes resentfully, that he was a small-town Midwesterner who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him.fficeffice" />



(A) who was thrust into a world that was dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than him



(B) who had been thrust into a world that was dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him



(C) who had been thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and people more polished than he was



(D) thrust into a world dominated by more wealthy, educated, and polished people than him



(E) thrust into a world dominated by wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people than he



答案是E,可是我选了C,我觉得he 后的was 不该省,但是,who had been.......又仿佛累赘.比较级的时候,何时谓语可以省,何时谓语不可以省?哪位大侠给讲讲啊。谢谢^^*












who had been thrust是过去完成时态,表示the action had ceased at a point of past time.是ets常常说的过去完成时态的错误.


was 的问题呐,是可以省.因为意思不会改.


比如you are older than I (am). 这个am就可以省.


看看og46


46. A study commissioned by the Department of Agriculture showed that if calves exercise and associated with other calves, they will require less medication and gain weight quicker than do those raised in confinement.


(A) associated with other calves, they will require less medication and gain weight quicker than do


(B) associated with other calves, they require less medication and gain weight quicker than


(C) associate with other calves, they required less medication and will gain weight quicker than do


(D) associate with other calves, they have required less medication and will gain weight more quickly than do


(E) associate with other calves, they require less medication and gain weight more quickly than


答案是E, 后头也省略了do.因为都是一般现在时态.而a就有do, 因为是将来时态和现在时态的比较.


请多指教


6#
发表于 2004-2-19 13:39:00 | 只看该作者
刚看了白勇的语法书,说比较从句联系动词be与主句联系动词be相同,可以省略be,也可以不省略。


但是前面好像是wealthier, better-educated, and more polished people 和 he比较,前面就没有was呢。。但是为什么是he而不是him呢?

another example,if i wanna say"she is more handsome than me"

which one i should use?"me"or "I"?
7#
发表于 2004-2-19 15:23:00 | 只看该作者
我认为是I


这里比较的是主语。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-22 07:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部