ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1984|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LR0506-3-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-10 16:29:00 | 只看该作者

LR0506-3-15

Works of literature often present protagonists who scorn allegiance to their society and who advocaate detachment rather civic-mindedness. However, modern literature is distinguished from the literature of earlier eras in part because it more frequently treats such protagonists sympathetically. Sympathetic treatment fo such characters suggests to readers that one should be unconerned about contributing to societal good. Thus, modern literature can damage individuals who appropriate this attitude, as well as society at large.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the critic's argument relies?

the correct answer is B: It is to the advantage of some individuals that they be concerned with contributing to societal good.

I know why all the other four choices are wrong but do not understand why B is correct. I think it is not necessary to be "to the advantage".

沙发
发表于 2009-3-10 20:49:00 | 只看该作者
premise:  this treatment by mo. lit. cause individuals to be unconcerned

conclusion: if unconcerned, then individuals can be damaged. 

implied conclusion: to prevent being damaged, one needs to be concerned, (in other words, the author is assumping there is a cause between being concerned and being damaged)

hence B

if you still don't see it, let me know.  I can explain further.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 01:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部