ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7095|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教关于SENTENSE FRAGMENT

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-4-22 01:42:00 | 只看该作者

请教关于SENTENSE FRAGMENT

最近做GWD 老是在SENTENSE FRAGMENT这个问题上栽筋斗。 想请各位跟我详细讲一下这种结构到底怎么判断,怎么错了?
是不是跟以前看到的那种叫“夹心饼干”的错误一个意思。


GWD-8-Q18:


    

According to a recent study of consumer spending on
prescription medications, increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were
advertised most heavily accounts for almost half of the $20.8 billion
increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came
from sales
of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised
very little.


    

 


    

A.    
heavily accounts for almost half of
the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which
came


    

B.     
heavily were what accounted for almost
half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year; the remainder of
the increase coming


    

C.    
heavily accounted for almost half of
the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the
increase coming


    

D.    
heavily, accounting for almost half of
the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, while the remainder of
the increase came


    

E.     
heavily, which accounted for almost
half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, with the
remainder of it coming


    
答案是C我就选了D,因为我觉得,只有  ",accounting for"这样才能代表是指代了前面整个句子。因为我牢牢记住,“,which”只能指代前面的一个词 而要想指代前面的一个句子的整个的意思 如OG那个小鸟飞了出去就成长了的那一题目。是用-ING指代前面的意思,还有OG那个古代人的盾牌是用来PROTECTING。
那些都让我误选了D 每次都看到总结说错是错在D是sentence fragmented 。 真心求教!!!!!谢谢!!!!!
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-22 14:29:00 | 只看该作者
up up
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-22 16:53:00 | 只看该作者
真心求教~~
地板
发表于 2008-4-22 17:05:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用小小天在2008-4-22 1:42:00的发言:
最近做GWD 老是在SENTENSE FRAGMENT这个问题上栽筋斗。 想请各位跟我详细讲一下这种结构到底怎么判断,怎么错了?
是不是跟以前看到的那种叫“夹心饼干”的错误一个意思。


GWD-8-Q18:


 

According to a recent study of consumer spending on
prescription medications, increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were
advertised most heavily accounts for almost half of the $20.8 billion
increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came
from sales
of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised
very little.


 

 


 

A.    
heavily accounts for almost half of
the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which
came


 

B.     
heavily were what accounted for almost
half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year; the remainder of
the increase coming


 

C.    
heavily accounted for almost half of
the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the
increase coming


 

D.    
heavily, accounting for almost half of
the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, while the remainder of
the increase came


 

E.     
heavily, which accounted for almost
half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, with the
remainder of it coming


 
答案是C我就选了D,因为我觉得,只有  ",accounting for"这样才能代表是指代了前面整个句子。因为我牢牢记住,“,which”只能指代前面的一个词 而要想指代前面的一个句子的整个的意思 如OG那个小鸟飞了出去就成长了的那一题目。是用-ING指代前面的意思,还有OG那个古代人的盾牌是用来PROTECTING。
那些都让我误选了D 每次都看到总结说错是错在D是sentence fragmented 。 真心求教!!!!!谢谢!!!!!

D 没有谓语啊!

分析原句的话,可以看到

According to a recent study of consumer spending on
prescription medications, increases(主语) in the sales of the 50 drugs (定从可忽略不看)[that were
advertised most heavily] accounts(谓语) for almost half of the $20.8 billion
increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came
from sales
of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised
very little.

而D 只有accounting 分词形式, 并不能做谓语, 后面也没有出现谓语

而正确答案C,其实用的是独立结构, 而且用名词the increase 而非which , 来修饰remainder, 避免了which 的指代歧义, 用新东方的话讲就是出现名词来代替代词是正确标志

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-23 01:42:00 | 只看该作者
啊~~ 很有收获 非常谢谢~~ 那请问一下什么时候可以判断 那种-ING形式是在修饰前面整个一句话啊?
 我还想问一下 谁能详细讲一下“夹心饼干”的问题的错误 怎么判断啊?

谢谢~本人语法基础很差 希望各位不吝赐教~~
6#
发表于 2008-4-23 08:57:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得你最好还是多做一些题目, 仔细看讨论或者OG的解释, 通过题目来体会语法现象, 而不是倒过来问语法现象是什么, 然后再做题目

-ING形式是在修饰前面整个一句话  大概指的是分词表示前面一句话动作的影响

夹心饼干是说 一个分词, 在其前后都有动词, 则此时分词的指代会产生歧义.

7#
发表于 2016-10-5 08:33:26 | 只看该作者
为啥后半部分要用coming呢?不是应该保持平衡用came么?
8#
发表于 2016-12-20 21:39:25 | 只看该作者
greenjj 发表于 2016-10-5 08:33
为啥后半部分要用coming呢?不是应该保持平衡用came么?
同问,我就是因为纠结于coming这个形式,所以选错的,话说楼上现在明白为啥可以是coming了吗?求解
9#
发表于 2016-12-28 15:24:08 | 只看该作者
御寒 发表于 2016-12-20 21:39
同问,我就是因为纠结于coming这个形式,所以选错的,话说楼上现在明白为啥可以是coming了吗?求解 ...

这里the remainder + coming是独立主格结构,一般形式为NOUN + VERB-ed或者VERB-ing,表示对主句的补充说明。按照RON的说法:独立主格(absolute phrases) are created by removing some form of "to be" (is, are, was, were, etc.)
10#
发表于 2017-1-2 10:02:21 | 只看该作者
edguy 发表于 2016-12-28 15:24
这里the remainder + coming是独立主格结构,一般形式为NOUN + VERB-ed或者VERB-ing,表示对主句的补充说 ...

稍微有点明白了~多谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-9 14:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部