ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6831|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

补充材料177

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-17 05:25:00 | 只看该作者

补充材料177

177.    Believed to originate from a small area on their foreheads, elephants emit low-frequency sounds that may be used as a secret language to communicate with other members of the herd.
(A) Believed to originate from a small area on their foreheads, elephants emit low-frequency sounds that may be used
(B) Elephants emit low-frequency sounds that are believed to originate from a small area on their foreheads, and they may use this
(C) Elephants emit low-frequency sounds, believed to originate from a small area on their foreheads, that they may use
(D) Originating, it is believed, from a small area on their foreheads; elephants emit low-frequency sounds they may use
(E) Originating, it is believed, from a small area on their foreheads, low-frequency sounds are emitted by elephants that may be used
C中的believed to为何就不会引起歧义了呢?不会被误认为是修饰elephants吗?如何区分类似情况呢?
沙发
发表于 2003-12-17 07:29:00 | 只看该作者
它是就近修饰souds,不会歧义啊.再说其他选项都有问题.
板凳
发表于 2004-8-20 02:04:00 | 只看该作者

还有一个问题:

“that they may use...”修饰“sounds”那不就是“that”引导非限定性定语从句了吗?

地板
发表于 2004-9-7 00:13:00 | 只看该作者

up~~~

我也有问题,C选项的believed...和后面的that从句不是都是修饰sounds的吗?中间不需要连接词,用逗号就可以的吗??

5#
发表于 2004-9-7 01:40:00 | 只看该作者

B,C中的believed to 都没错,就近修饰low-frequency sounds. B 错在this 指代错误, this 不能指代 low-frequency sounds,

however, C can.

6#
发表于 2005-1-2 15:52:00 | 只看该作者

关于这道题还有没有其他的解释阿?


看了上面的解释还是不明白:


如果that they may use是修饰sounds,为什么不就近修饰呢?是因为believed....作为插入语,才用that,不用which的吗?


谢谢。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-2 16:13:45编辑过]
7#
发表于 2005-1-2 17:14:00 | 只看该作者

顶,我在OG8也发现疑是THAT修饰非限制性定语从句的


Lacking information about energy use, people tend to overestimate the amount of energy used by  visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate that  used by unobtrusive equipment, such as water heaters.


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&star=2&replyid=222152&id=29567&skin=0&page=1


NN们的讨论,有结论说是在插入语的情况下,THAT在有逗号情况下也可以正常引导定语从句,我也不是太清楚这算是限制性还是非限制性定语从句。



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-2 17:20:56编辑过]
8#
发表于 2005-1-3 11:54:00 | 只看该作者
thanks...Shuaishuai
9#
发表于 2005-1-3 22:39:00 | 只看该作者

这里 that ... 不是修饰非限制性定语从句,而是被 believed ... 插入成分与被修饰成分sounds分开了。

believed ... 单从纯语法上讲,有修饰歧义,elephants 和 sounds 都可以被 believed,

但从表达意义上讲,只有 sounds 可以被 believed to originated from foreheads.

10#
发表于 2005-9-7 11:03:00 | 只看该作者

由于that是限定性从句,因此,前面的","使“believed to originate from a small area on their foreheads”的成分变成了插入语,从而消除了楼主关于“C中的believed to为何就不会引起歧义了呢?不会被误认为是修饰elephants吗?如何区分类似情况呢?”的问题。


本题问题最小的是C(除了they的指代有三种可能外,其它选项的问题都解决了),而且they在有疑惑情况下,也首选指代主句主语。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 22:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部