恩,我不是困惑同位语判断的标准,而是困惑the和that的用法。呵呵。
比如 OG 10-18,237
18.Computers are becoming faster, more powerful, and more reliable, and so too are modems, they are the devices to allow two or more computers to share information over regular telephone lines. (A) so too are modems, they are the devices to allow (B) so too are modems, the devices that allow (C) so too modems, the devices allowing (D) also modems, they are the devices that allow (E) also modems, which are the devices to allow the之后+devices+限制性修饰that, 表示一类devices。而不是特定“某几个”devices, 属于限定性修饰中的“泛指”。
但是:
237. It seems likely that a number of astronomical phenomena, such as the formation of planetary nebulas, may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other at close range. (A) may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other (B) may be caused by the interaction between two stars that each orbit the other (C) are because of the interaction between two stars that orbit each other (D) are caused by the interaction of two stars where each is orbiting the other (E) are caused by the interaction of two stars orbiting each other Choice C can be faulted because to form a passive construction, are should take a verb form such as caused rather than an adverb such as because. Also, the phrase two stars that orbit each other illogically suggests that there are two particular stars causing all the phenomena in question, rather than various sets of stars in various locations. OG说,C的结构-two stars that ....表示“特定的两个星星”,所以错。这时,that....就 表示限制性修饰中的“特指”。
同样结构,两种说法,Why。
还有一个问题。第18题中,the device的the去掉可不可以? Why
|